The smartphone landscape is filled with choices, but few comparisons highlight such a generational leap as the OnePlus Nord 5 and the Nokia 6.2. The Nokia 6.2, representing a mature and affordable option, faces off against the newer Nord 5, boasting a cutting-edge Snapdragon processor and rapid charging. This comparison isn't about raw specs; it's about understanding where each phone excels and who benefits most from its strengths.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed, future-proofing, and a vibrant display, the OnePlus Nord 5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Nokia 6.2's aging Snapdragon 636 and 10W charging. However, the Nokia 6.2 remains a viable option for those on a tight budget who value long-term endurance and a simpler experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, October 17 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, July 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 509 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Android One | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (excl. India) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min
5W reverse wired
Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ice | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands |
| Models | TA-1200, TA-1198, TA-1201, TA-1187 | CPH2709 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.97 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -94.8dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 73h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1525:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 65dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 79dB
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 114947 (v7), 140736 (v8)
GeekBench: 4882 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | - | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Nokia 6.2
- Excellent battery endurance (73h)
- Affordable price point
- Reliable and simple user experience
- Slow charging speed (10W)
- Outdated processor (Snapdragon 636)
- Dimmer display compared to competitors
OnePlus Nord 5
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor
- Ultra-fast 80W charging (54 min to 100%)
- Bright and vibrant display (1330 nits)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter long-term battery lifespan due to faster charging
- More complex software features
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5’s display immediately stands out with a measured peak brightness of 1330 nits, significantly exceeding the Nokia 6.2’s 580 nits. This translates to vastly improved visibility outdoors and a more vibrant viewing experience. While the Nokia 6.2 offers a respectable 1525:1 contrast ratio, the Nord 5’s superior brightness and likely more advanced panel technology (though not specified) provide a more immersive visual experience. The Nokia 6.2’s display, while adequate, feels dated in comparison, particularly for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but without specific sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Nord 5’s positioning as a mid-range powerhouse, it likely features a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and improved image processing. The Nokia 6.2, being an older model, likely utilizes a more basic camera setup. The absence of details on OIS or aperture sizes for either device makes a definitive assessment impossible, but the Nord 5’s overall hardware advantage suggests superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 5’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, represents a massive leap in performance and efficiency over the Nokia 6.2’s 14nm Snapdragon 636. The 8s Gen 3’s octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, delivers significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Nokia 6.2’s Kryo 260 cores, while efficient for their time, simply cannot compete. This architectural difference also impacts thermal management; the 4nm node of the 8s Gen 3 generates less heat, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a complex charging ecosystem – 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 5W reverse wired – and a full charge in just 54 minutes. This is a stark contrast to the Nokia 6.2’s slow 10W wired charging. While the Nokia 6.2 has an endurance rating of 73 hours, the Nord 5’s active use score of 13:47h and 49:12h endurance rating, combined with its faster charging, offers a more convenient user experience. The Nord 5’s ability to bypass charging is also a notable feature, potentially extending battery lifespan by reducing heat during overnight charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 6.2 if you need a reliable, long-lasting phone for basic tasks, prioritize battery endurance over peak performance, and are on a very limited budget. Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you prefer a fast and responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, demand quick charging, and want a brighter, more modern display. The Nord 5 is for users who want a phone that can keep up with their digital lives.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the OnePlus Nord 5 get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3's 4nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to older chipsets. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the Nord 5 should manage temperatures effectively, minimizing performance throttling. However, sustained high-intensity tasks will still result in some warming.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Nokia 6.2 realistically usable in 2024, or is it painfully slow?
10W charging is undeniably slow by modern standards. Expect a full charge to take several hours. While usable for overnight charging, it's a significant inconvenience if you need a quick power boost. It's best suited for users who consistently charge their phones overnight and don't frequently run out of battery during the day.
❓ How does the battery health of the OnePlus Nord 5 hold up with 80W fast charging over the long term?
While 80W charging is incredibly convenient, it can potentially accelerate battery degradation over time compared to slower charging methods. However, OnePlus implements charging safeguards to mitigate this effect. The Nord 5's bypass charging feature can also help extend battery lifespan by reducing heat during overnight charging.
