Nokia's budget-friendly lineup offers compelling options for users seeking reliable Android experiences. The Nokia 6.2 and 7.1 both boast solid features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comparison dives deep into their specs and performance to help you decide which one is the better choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 7.1 edges out the 6.2 thanks to its faster charging (18W vs 10W), slightly better sunlight visibility on the display, and marginally improved battery life. Both offer similar performance thanks to the Snapdragon 636, making the 7.1 a more well-rounded package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 40, 66 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, October 17 | 2018, October 04. Released 2018, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 149.7 x 71.2 x 8 mm (5.89 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.84 inches, 85.1 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 509 | Adreno 509 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Android One | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 1.28µm, dual pixel PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes (excl. India) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 408 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 19 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3060 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ice | Gloss midnight blue, gloss steel |
| Models | TA-1200, TA-1198, TA-1201, TA-1187 | TA-1100, TA-1097, TA-1085, TA-1095, TA-1096 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.97 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) | 0.26 W/kg (head) 1.74 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -94.8dB |
Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -94.4dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 73h
|
Endurance rating 80h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1525:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1300:1 (nominal), 2.804 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 65dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 79dB
|
Voice 75dB / Noise 76dB / Ring 81dB
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 114947 (v7), 140736 (v8)
GeekBench: 4882 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 117175 (v7)
GeekBench: 4975 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nokia 6.2
- Excellent battery life (73h endurance)
- High contrast ratio display (1525:1)
- Clean Android experience
- Slow 10W charging
- Average camera performance
- Lower sunlight visibility compared to 7.1
Nokia 7.1
- Faster 18W charging
- Better sunlight display visibility (2.804)
- Slightly longer battery life (80h endurance)
- Premium design (generally perceived)
- Lower contrast ratio display (1300:1)
- Average camera performance
- Slightly more expensive than 6.2
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a 1525:1 and 1300:1 contrast ratio respectively (Nokia 6.2 nominal, Nokia 7.1 nominal). However, the Nokia 7.1 shines in direct sunlight with a measured brightness of 2.804, making it easier to view outdoors. The Nokia 6.2 boasts a slightly higher measured max brightness of 580 nits, but the 7.1's sunlight performance is a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable between the two. Both offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is average for the price range. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are not provided, but user reviews suggest similar results in most scenarios.
Performance
Under the hood, both devices share the same Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 chipset and CPU. Expect similar performance in everyday tasks, app usage, and light gaming. Neither phone is a powerhouse, but they handle typical Android usage without major hiccups.
Battery Life
The Nokia 7.1 holds a slight advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 80 hours compared to the 6.2's 73 hours. This difference is noticeable but not drastic, and real-world usage will vary.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 6.2 is a good choice for users prioritizing maximum battery life and a high contrast ratio display in a budget-conscious purchase. The Nokia 7.1 is ideal for those who value faster charging, better outdoor visibility, and a slightly more premium feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Nokia 6.2 or 7.1 better for gaming?
Neither phone is ideal for demanding games. Both are powered by the Snapdragon 636, which is sufficient for casual gaming but may struggle with newer, graphically intensive titles.
❓ Which Nokia phone has the better design?
The Nokia 7.1 is generally considered to have a more premium design with a glass back and a more modern aesthetic compared to the 6.2's plastic build.
