Motorola Moto G Power (2025) vs. Nokia 6.2: A Battery Life and Performance Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G Power (2025) is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 636, coupled with 30W wired and 15W wireless charging, addressing the Nokia 6.2’s slower charging and aging processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia 6.2 | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 7, 12, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, October 17 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 166.6 x 77.1 x 8.7 mm (6.56 x 3.04 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 509 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Android One | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ 13mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (excl. India) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 30W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ice | Slate Gray, Leaf Green |
| Models | TA-1200, TA-1198, TA-1201, TA-1187 | XT2515-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 199.99 |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.97 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -94.8dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 73h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1525:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 65dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 79dB | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 114947 (v7), 140736 (v8) GeekBench: 4882 (v4.4) GFXBench: 5.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Nokia 6.2
- Exceptional battery endurance (73h rating)
- Higher contrast ratio (1525:1)
- Proven reliability and software support (historically)
- Outdated Snapdragon 636 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Dimmer display (580 nits)
Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
- Faster and more efficient Mediatek Dimensity 6300
- Significantly brighter display (993 nits)
- 30W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Slightly lower contrast ratio (1358:1)
- Potentially shorter overall battery life compared to Nokia 6.2 (despite better active use score)
- Motorola's software update track record is less consistent than Nokia's
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Power (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 993 nits compared to the Nokia 6.2’s 580 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors. While the Nokia 6.2 offers a slightly higher contrast ratio (1525:1 vs 1358:1), the difference is less noticeable in real-world use. Both displays lack high refresh rates, focusing on efficiency. The brighter panel on the Moto G Power is a clear advantage for media consumption and everyday usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed with basic 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking detailed camera specifications. Given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both feature modest camera systems. The Nokia 6.2 likely relies on software processing to enhance image quality, while the Moto G Power (2025) may benefit from the improved ISP within the Dimensity 6300. Without further details, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but the newer chipset in the Motorola phone suggests a potential edge in image processing.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the Moto G Power (2025) represents a significant architectural leap over the Snapdragon 636 in the Nokia 6.2. Built on a 6nm process versus the Snapdragon’s 14nm, the Dimensity 6300 offers improved power efficiency and performance. The CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 636’s 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver. This means smoother app launches and a better experience with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Power (2025) delivers a compelling 11:56h active use score, significantly exceeding the Nokia 6.2’s endurance rating of 73 hours. While the endurance rating is a standardized test, the active use score provides a more realistic measure of daily performance. Crucially, the Moto G Power (2025) supports 30W wired charging and 15W wireless charging, drastically reducing recharge times compared to the Nokia 6.2’s slow 10W wired charging. This faster charging capability is a major advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 6.2 if you absolutely prioritize maximizing screen-on time above all else and are comfortable with a slower processor and charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for minimalists. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2025) if you prefer a more responsive experience, faster charging, and a brighter display, even if it means slightly less overall endurance. It’s ideal for users who actively use their phones throughout the day.