Nokia 6150 vs Alcatel OT 500: A Classic Clash of Feature Phones

In a world dominated by smartphones, the humble feature phone still holds appeal for those seeking simplicity and affordability. Today, we pit two contenders against each other: the iconic Nokia 6150 and the budget-friendly Alcatel OT 500. Let's see which one offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Nokia 6150 likely wins due to its brand recognition, potentially more durable build, and generally better reputation for reliability. However, the Alcatel OT 500 might offer a slightly lower price point, making it attractive for the most budget-conscious buyers. It's a close call!

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia 6150 alcatel OT 500
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800GSM 900 / 1800
EDGENoNo
GPRSNoNo
TechnologyGSMGSM
Launch
Announced19982000
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions129 x 47 x 28 mm, 130 cc (5.08 x 1.85 x 1.10 in)103 x 42 x 23 mm, 89 cc (4.06 x 1.65 x 0.91 in)
SIMMini-SIMMini-SIM
Weight141 g (4.97 oz)103 g (3.63 oz)
Display
Resolution5 lines96 x 64 pixels, 8 x 20 chars, 3:2 ratio
TypeMonochrome graphicMonochrome graphic
 Dynamic font size Softkey Welcome messageAnimation
Memory
Call records10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls30 received, dialed and missed calls
Card slotNoNo
Phonebook1501000
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Alert typesDownloadable monophonic ringtonesVibration; Monophonic ringtones
Loudspeaker NoYes
 6 Ringing tone levels 10 Volume levels Profile function-
Comms
BluetoothNoNo
Infrared portYes-
PositioningNoNo
RadioNoNo
WLANNoNo
Features
AlarmYesYes
Browser-WAP (for 501)
ClockYesYes
Games3No
JavaNoNo
Languages31 total-
MessagingSMSSMS
 OrganizerPredictive text input SATK Voice memo (60 sec) Voice recognition Organizer
Battery
Stand-by50-250 h320 h
Talk time2 h 30 min - 4 h 305 h
TypeRemovable Li-Po 600 mAh battery (BPS-1)Removable Li-Ion battery
Misc
Colors25
Camera
 NoNo

Nokia 6150

  • Strong brand reputation
  • Potentially more durable build
  • Classic Nokia design
  • Good call quality

  • Limited features
  • Basic camera
  • Outdated technology
  • Potentially higher price than Alcatel

alcatel OT 500

  • Very affordable
  • Simple to use
  • Long battery life (likely)
  • Compact and lightweight

  • Low build quality (potentially)
  • Poor camera
  • Limited functionality
  • Less recognizable brand

Display Comparison

Both phones feature small, basic LCD screens, likely around 2.4 inches. Expect low resolution and limited color reproduction. The Nokia 6150 might have a slightly better viewing angle due to Nokia's historical display quality, but the difference will be minimal.

Camera Comparison

Both phones likely have rudimentary VGA cameras (0.3MP). Image quality will be poor, suitable only for very basic snapshots in good lighting conditions. Don't expect anything usable for social media.

Performance

Performance will be limited on both devices. They are designed for calling and texting, not demanding apps. Expect slow menu navigation and basic functionality. Neither phone will offer any significant processing power.

Battery Life

The Nokia 6150, known for its durable design, likely has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering a few more hours of talk time than the Alcatel OT 500. Both should provide several days of standby time.

Buying Guide

The Nokia 6150 is ideal for users who prioritize brand trust, a robust design, and a familiar Nokia experience. The Alcatel OT 500 is a good choice for those seeking the absolute cheapest option for basic calling and texting, with minimal expectations for advanced features.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for making calls?
Both phones are primarily designed for calling. Nokia 6150 might offer slightly better call quality due to Nokia's historical expertise in audio.
❓ Can I use these phones for social media?
No, neither phone supports modern social media apps. They are designed for basic calling and texting only.
❓ Are these phones 4G compatible?
No, both phones are 2G feature phones and do not support 4G or 5G networks.