Nokia, a name synonymous with mobile history, produced a diverse range of devices. Today, we pit two distinct models against each other: the budget-friendly Nokia 500 and the flagship Nokia Lumia 1520. This comparison will explore their strengths and weaknesses, helping you decide which phone best suits your needs, even years after their release.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 1520 is the clear winner. Its superior processing power, stunning display, advanced camera capabilities, and exceptional battery life far outweigh the Nokia 500's simplicity. While the 500 offers a nostalgic experience, the 1520 delivers a significantly more modern and capable smartphone experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - RM-937, RM-939, RM-940 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 - RM-937 |
| Speed | HSPA 14.4/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 4, 5, 7, 17 - RM-938, RM-940 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, August. Released 2011, September | 2013, October. Released 2013, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 111.3 x 53.8 x 14.1 mm, 73 cc (4.38 x 2.12 x 0.56 in) | 162.8 x 85.4 x 8.7 mm, 120.3 cc (6.41 x 3.36 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 93 g (3.28 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 |
| Resolution | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~367 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~47.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | IPS LCD |
| | - | ClearBlack display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz ARM 11 | Quad-core 2.2 GHz Krait 400 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8974 Snapdragon 800 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Adreno 330 |
| OS | Symbian Anna, upgradable to Nokia Belle OS | Microsoft Windows Phone 8, upgradable to Windows 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 2GB 256MB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 20 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.5", 1.12µm, AF, OIS |
| Video | 480p@15fps | 4K@30fps (after WP8 Denim update), 1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | Yes | 1.2 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | - | 720p@30fps |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE/ aptX after WP8 Denim update |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, sensor core |
| | Exchangeable battery covers with multiple home screens (2 included in the retail box)
MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/еAAC+/WMA player
Photo editor
Organizer
Voice command/dial
Predictive text input | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless (Qi) |
| Music play | Up to 35 h | Up to 124 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 500 h (2G) / Up to 455 h (3G) | Up to 768 h (2G) / Up to 768 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 5 h (3G) | Up to 27 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 25 h (3G) |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1110 mAh battery (BL-4U) | Li-Ion 3400 mAh, non-removable (BV-4BW) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black/White with covers in Black, Azure Blue, Coral Red, Purple, Khaki, Orange, Green, Pink, Silver | Yellow, white, black, red, green (AT&T) |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| SAR | 1.47 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.18 W/kg (head) | 0.64 W/kg (head) 0.20 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -90.1dB / Crosstalk -91.2dB |
Noise -89.3dB / Crosstalk -89.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera |
Photo |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1207:1 (nominal) / 1.813:1 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 73dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 75dB
|
Voice 73dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 74dB
|
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -90.1dB / Crosstalk -91.2dB | Noise -89.3dB / Crosstalk -89.4dB |
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | Photo | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1207:1 (nominal) / 1.813:1 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 73dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 75dB | Voice 73dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 74dB |
Nokia 500
- Extremely affordable
- Compact and lightweight
- Simple and easy to use
- Nostalgic design
- Outdated hardware
- Low-resolution display
- Limited camera capabilities
- Slow performance
Nokia Lumia 1520
- Large, high-resolution display
- Powerful processor
- Excellent camera
- Long battery life
- Wireless charging (Qi)
- Older model (limited software updates)
- Larger size may be unwieldy for some
- Potential for battery degradation over time
Display Comparison
The Lumia 1520 boasts a massive 6-inch Full HD (1080p) display with an impressive 1207:1 contrast ratio (nominal) and 1.813:1 in sunlight, offering exceptional visibility. The Nokia 500 has a much smaller 2.4-inch QVGA display, which is adequate for basic tasks but lacks the clarity and immersion of the Lumia 1520.
Camera Comparison
The Lumia 1520's camera is a major advantage, featuring both photo and video capabilities. It typically had a 41MP main sensor (depending on the specific variant), offering excellent image quality and detail. The Nokia 500's camera is limited to basic photo capture, lacking video recording and offering considerably lower resolution.
Performance
The Lumia 1520's Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset and quad-core 2.2 GHz Krait 400 CPU provide significantly faster performance than the Nokia 500's 1.0 GHz ARM 11 processor and Mediatek MT6572 chipset. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive user experience on the Lumia 1520.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the Lumia 1520's larger battery capacity (3400 mAh) contributes to its longevity, especially considering its more powerful hardware.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 500 is for those seeking a basic, ultra-affordable phone for calls, texts, and simple apps, perhaps as a secondary device or for nostalgic purposes. The Nokia Lumia 1520 is ideal for users who want a large-screened phone with a great camera and long battery life, even if it's an older model.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Nokia 500 worth buying in 2024?
Only if you're looking for a very basic, ultra-affordable phone for simple tasks or as a nostalgic device. Don't expect modern smartphone features.
❓ Can the Nokia Lumia 1520 still receive software updates?
Official software updates have ceased for the Lumia 1520. However, community-developed custom ROMs may offer extended functionality.