Nokia's feature phone lineage is legendary. We're pitting the virtually indestructible, culturally iconic Nokia 3350 against the modern, 4G-connected Nokia 8210 4G. This isn't about raw power; it's about understanding how a classic design stacks up against contemporary connectivity and a modest performance boost.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic communication and exceptional battery life, the Nokia 3350 remains a compelling choice. However, the Nokia 8210 4G wins for those needing mobile data access and modern features like VoLTE, despite its less legendary status.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - APAC, EU, RUCIS |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2001 | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, July 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 113 x 49 x 23 mm, 98 cc (4.45 x 1.93 x 0.91 in) | 131.3 x 56.2 x 13.8 mm (5.17 x 2.21 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 108 g (3.81 oz) | 107 g (3.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 96 x 65 pixels, 5 lines, 3:2 ratio | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) |
| Size | - | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~32.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Monochrome graphic | TFT LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc T107 (22 nm) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 20 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls | Yes |
| Card slot | No | microSDHC |
| Internal | - | 128MB 48MB RAM |
| Phonebook | 150 | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | - | 0.3 MP |
| Video | - | Unspecified |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable monophonic ringtones, composer | - |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | No | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | - | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | Wireless FM radio |
| USB | - | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Alarm | Yes | - |
| Browser | WAP 1.1 | - |
| Clock | Yes | - |
| Games | 6 - Bumper, Dance 2 Music, Link5, Magic Draw, Snake II, Space Impact | Yes |
| Java | No | No |
| Messaging | SMS | SMS, MMS |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 260 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h 45 min | - |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1000 mAh battery (BLC-2) | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | User exchangeable front and back covers | Sand, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | TA-1507, TA-1494, TA-1489, TA-1485, TA-1483 |
| Price | - | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Nokia 3350
- Exceptional battery life (days/weeks)
- Legendary durability and build quality
- Simple and intuitive user interface
- No 4G connectivity
- Limited functionality
- No modern app support
Nokia 8210 4G
- 4G connectivity for data access
- Support for modern apps like WhatsApp
- More modern user interface
- Shorter battery life compared to 3350
- Less durable build quality
- Performance limitations with demanding apps
Display Comparison
Given the lack of display specifications for the Nokia 3350, we can assume it utilizes a basic color LCD typical of its era. The Nokia 8210 4G, while not boasting a high-resolution panel, represents a significant upgrade in clarity. The 8210’s display benefits from being a newer technology, likely offering improved viewing angles and color reproduction, though it won't compete with smartphone displays. The 3350’s display is primarily functional, prioritizing readability over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera capabilities are minimal on both devices. The Nokia 3350 likely lacks a camera entirely, or features a very low-resolution sensor unsuitable for anything beyond basic documentation. The Nokia 8210 4G, while including a camera, is unlikely to deliver impressive image quality. Its primary function is for quick snapshots, not photography. The focus here isn't on image quality, but on the presence of a camera as a modern convenience.
Performance
The Nokia 8210 4G’s Unisoc T107 chipset, fabricated on a 22nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia 3350’s unknown, but undoubtedly simpler, architecture. The 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU in the 8210 4G allows for smoother operation of apps like WhatsApp and basic web browsing, tasks impossible on the 3350. While not a powerhouse, the T107 offers a level of responsiveness the 3350 simply cannot match. The 22nm node, while not leading-edge, is more efficient than the likely larger process node used in the 3350, potentially impacting standby time.
Battery Life
The Nokia 3350 is renowned for its exceptional battery life, potentially lasting days or even weeks on a single charge due to its minimal power consumption. The Nokia 8210 4G, with its 4G connectivity and more powerful chipset, will have significantly shorter battery life, likely lasting a few days with moderate use. However, the 8210 4G benefits from modern battery management techniques, potentially optimizing standby time. The trade-off is clear: longevity for the 3350, convenience for the 8210 4G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 3350 if you need an incredibly durable, long-lasting phone for essential calls and texts, and value simplicity above all else. Buy the Nokia 8210 4G if you prefer the convenience of 4G connectivity for occasional data use, WhatsApp access, and a slightly more modern user experience, accepting a trade-off in potential battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Nokia 8210 4G support VoLTE calling, and will it work on all networks?
The Nokia 8210 4G does support VoLTE (Voice over LTE), which is crucial for making calls on many modern 4G networks as carriers phase out 3G. However, compatibility varies by carrier and region. It's essential to check with your mobile provider to ensure the 8210 4G is certified for their network before purchasing.
❓ How much faster is the Nokia 8210 4G compared to the Nokia 3350 in terms of web browsing?
The Nokia 8210 4G is exponentially faster for web browsing. The 3350 lacks any meaningful web browsing capability. The 8210 4G, with its 4G connectivity and Unisoc T107 chipset, can access basic websites, though the experience will be slow and limited compared to a smartphone. The 3350 cannot access the internet without significant modification.
❓ Is the Nokia 8210 4G a good option for someone who primarily needs a phone for emergency calls?
Yes, the Nokia 8210 4G is a good option for emergency calls, and offers the added benefit of 4G connectivity which can be crucial in areas with limited 2G/3G coverage. Its battery life, while not as long as the 3350, is still respectable, and the ability to make VoLTE calls ensures compatibility with modern networks.
