Looking for a reliable and affordable feature phone? The Nokia 301 and C2-01 are both strong contenders in the budget market. But which one reigns supreme? This detailed comparison will break down their features and help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 301 generally edges out the C2-01 thanks to likely improved audio quality and potentially a slightly more modern design. However, the C2-01's camera, albeit basic, provides a small advantage for those wanting to capture simple photos. Both are excellent value for their price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - RM-840, RM-841 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - RM-840, RM-839 | UMTS 850 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | Yes, 384 kbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / UMTS |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 - RM-841 | UMTS 900 / 2100 / 1900 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2013, February. Released 2013, April | 2010, November. Released 2011, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 114 x 50 x 12.5 mm, 104.2 cc (4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 in) | 109.8 x 46.9 x 15.3 mm, 78.8 cc (4.32 x 1.85 x 0.60 in) |
| SIM | Single SIM (Mini-SIM) or Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 102 g (3.60 oz) | 89 g (3.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~200 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~31.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.0 inches, 12.4 cm2 (~24.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | TFT, 256K colors |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256MB ROM, 64MB RAM | 43MB 64MB RAM 128MB ROM |
| Phonebook | Yes | 2000 entries, Photocall |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 3.15 MP | 3.15 MP |
| Video | 320p@30fps | 320p@15fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 2.1, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | Proprietary | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite |
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | Yes, MIDP 2.1 |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, IM | SMS, MMS, Email |
| | SNS applications
MP4/H.263/WMV player
MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC player
Organizer
Predictive text input | MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/WMA/eAAC+ player
Organizer
Voice memo/dial/commands
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | - | Up to 34 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 888 h (2G) / Up to 936 h (3G) | Up to 396 h (2G) / Up to 456 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 20 h (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G) | Up to 8 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 4 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 1110 mAh, removable (BL-4U) | Removable Li-Ion 1020 mAh battery (BL-5C) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cyan, Black, Yellow, Magenta, White | Black, Warm silver, White |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | 1.25 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | 1.33 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.29 W/kg (head) | 1.20 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -87.3dB / Crosstalk -88.8dB |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 72dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 79dB |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -87.3dB / Crosstalk -88.8dB |
| Camera | - | Photo |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 72dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 79dB |
Nokia 301
- Likely better audio quality
- Potentially more modern design
- Excellent battery life
- FM Radio
- May lack a camera
- Basic display
- Limited features
Nokia C2-01
- Basic camera functionality
- Excellent battery life
- FM Radio
- Very affordable
- Low-resolution camera
- Basic display
- Limited features
- Older design
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature small, basic LCD screens, typical of feature phones. Expect low resolution and limited viewing angles. The Nokia 301 might have a slightly brighter display, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia C2-01 has a basic camera, allowing for very low-resolution photos. The Nokia 301 may not have a camera, or if it does, it will be similarly basic. Image quality on both will be poor by modern standards, suitable only for quick, simple snapshots.
Performance
Performance will be similar on both devices – adequate for calls, texts, and basic FM radio usage. Don't expect any advanced features or multitasking capabilities. Both rely on simple, efficient processors to maximize battery life.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to offer excellent battery life, a hallmark of feature phones. The Nokia 301 might have a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially extending its usage time further.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 301 is ideal for users prioritizing call quality, FM radio, and a slightly more contemporary feel. The Nokia C2-01 is a good choice for those who want a very basic phone with a camera, even if it's just for occasional snapshots.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones smartphones?
No, these are feature phones. They primarily focus on calls, texts, and basic features like FM radio, not apps or internet browsing.
❓ What is the battery life like?
Both phones offer excellent battery life, typically lasting several days on a single charge with moderate usage.