Looking for a reliable and affordable feature phone? The Nokia 301 and Nokia 230 are popular choices, offering essential functionality without breaking the bank. But which one reigns supreme? This comparison dives deep into their features to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 230 generally edges out the 301 due to its slightly improved camera and potentially more modern design. However, the 301 might offer better value depending on pricing and regional availability. Both are solid choices for basic communication and entertainment.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - RM-840, RM-841 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - RM-840, RM-839 | - |
| EDGE | - | Up to 236.8 kbps |
| GPRS | - | Up to 85.6 kbps |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 - RM-841 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2013, February. Released 2013, April | 2015, November. Released 2015, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 114 x 50 x 12.5 mm, 104.2 cc (4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 in) | 124.6 x 53.4 x 10.9 mm (4.91 x 2.10 x 0.43 in) |
| Keyboard | - | QWERTY |
| SIM | Single SIM (Mini-SIM) or Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 102 g (3.60 oz) | 91.8 g (3.25 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~31.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~36.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | TFT, 65K colors |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256MB ROM, 64MB RAM | 16MB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | 1000 entries |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 3.15 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | 320p@30fps | 240p@15fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | - | 2 MP |
| Video | - | 480p |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 3.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | Stereo FM radio |
| USB | Proprietary | microUSB 1.1 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML |
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | No |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, IM | SMS(threaded view), MMS, IM |
| | SNS applications
MP4/H.263/WMV player
MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC player
Organizer
Predictive text input | SNS applications
MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/AAC player
Organizer
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | - | Up to 52 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 888 h (2G) / Up to 936 h (3G) | Up to 648 h |
| Talk time | Up to 20 h (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G) | Up to 23 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 1110 mAh, removable (BL-4U) | Li-Ion 1200 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cyan, Black, Yellow, Magenta, White | Black, White, Dark Blue, Light Gray |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | 1.25 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.29 W/kg (head) | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.46 W/kg (body) |
Nokia 301
- Durable build
- Classic Nokia design
- Good battery life
- FM Radio
- Basic camera
- Limited storage
- Outdated design for some
Nokia 230
- Slightly better camera
- Potentially more modern design
- Good battery life
- FM Radio
- Still a basic camera
- Limited storage
- Can feel plasticky
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature small, QVGA (or similar resolution) color displays. Expect adequate visibility in good lighting, but limited detail. The Nokia 230 might have a slightly more refined screen, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia 230 likely boasts a slightly better camera (potentially 2MP vs 1.3MP on the 301), allowing for marginally improved photo quality. However, don't expect high-quality images from either device.
Performance
Performance will be basic on both devices, suitable for calls, texts, and simple games. Expect limited multitasking capabilities. The Nokia 230 might have a slightly more efficient processor, leading to marginally smoother operation.
Battery Life
Both phones are known for excellent battery life, typical of feature phones. Expect several days of usage on a single charge. The Nokia 230 might have a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially extending battery life further.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 301 is ideal for users prioritizing a robust build and classic Nokia experience. The Nokia 230 is a better fit for those wanting a slightly more modern aesthetic and a marginally better camera for occasional snapshots.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Nokia 301 and 230?
The Nokia 230 generally has a slightly better camera and a potentially more modern design. The Nokia 301 is known for its robust build and classic Nokia feel.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both offer excellent battery life, but the Nokia 230 might have a slight edge due to a potentially larger battery capacity.
