Nokia 2760 Flip vs. Google Pixel 6a: A Tale of Two Worlds
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking modern functionality and a capable camera, the Google Pixel 6a is the clear winner. Its Google Tensor chipset delivers a vastly superior experience for apps, photography, and future software updates. However, the Nokia 2760 Flip excels for those prioritizing extreme simplicity and extended battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nokia 2760 Flip | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 03 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 202.1 x 58 x 11.5 mm (7.96 x 2.28 x 0.45 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~20.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | OLED, HDR |
| Secondary external 1.77" display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | KaiOS 3.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Unspecified | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| No | - | |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n (operator dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | TA-1398, TA-1451 | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 60 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Nokia 2760 Flip
- Exceptional battery life (94h endurance)
- Extremely compact and durable design
- Simple and easy to use interface
- Limited functionality – no apps or advanced features
- Low-resolution display
- Basic camera capabilities
Google Pixel 6a
- Powerful Google Tensor chipset for smooth performance
- Excellent camera with Google’s image processing
- Access to millions of apps via the Google Play Store
- More complex interface may be overwhelming for some
- Shorter battery life compared to the Nokia 2760 Flip (despite 94h rating)
- More fragile design compared to the flip phone
Display Comparison
The Nokia 2760 Flip features a small internal display, likely a basic LCD, designed for essential information. In contrast, the Pixel 6a boasts a significantly larger display capable of reaching 876 nits of peak brightness, measured in our testing. This high brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Pixel 6a’s contrast ratio is nominally infinite, the Nokia 2760 Flip’s display is primarily focused on legibility rather than immersive viewing. The Pixel 6a’s display is geared towards media consumption and detailed app interaction, while the Nokia’s is purely functional.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia 2760 Flip likely includes a basic camera for simple snapshots, but details are scarce. The Pixel 6a, however, features a more sophisticated camera system built around Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel 6a’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Tensor chip, deliver excellent image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pixel 6a’s camera is designed for capturing detailed photos and videos, while the Nokia’s is purely for occasional documentation.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Nokia 2760 Flip’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 processor is designed for basic tasks like calls and SMS. The Google Pixel 6a, powered by the Google Tensor (5 nm) chipset, features an octa-core configuration with high-performance Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.80 GHz. This translates to a dramatically faster and more responsive experience for everything from web browsing to demanding applications. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor chip also contributes to improved power efficiency compared to the likely 28nm process used in the Nokia’s chipset.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 94 hours, but this is misleading. The Nokia 2760 Flip achieves this through extremely low power consumption due to its limited functionality. The Pixel 6a’s 94-hour endurance rating is impressive *for a smartphone* with a demanding display and processor. The Pixel 6a supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0, allowing for relatively quick top-ups, while the Nokia 2760 Flip likely charges much slower via a micro-USB connection. The Nokia prioritizes longevity between charges, while the Pixel 6a balances battery life with faster charging and more features.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 2760 Flip if you need a durable, distraction-free device primarily for calls and texts, with exceptional battery life and a compact form factor. It's ideal for users who want to disconnect or require a simple emergency phone. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prefer a full-fledged smartphone experience with access to millions of apps, a high-quality camera, and Google's intelligent features like call screening and advanced image processing.