Nokia's legacy of reliable and affordable phones lives on with the 2700 Classic and the 215 Dual SIM. Both offer a return to simpler times, but which one is the better choice for those seeking a basic, no-frills mobile experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 215 Dual SIM edges out the 2700 Classic thanks to its dual SIM functionality, slightly improved battery life, and more modern features like FM radio. While the 2700 Classic boasts a classic design, the 215 offers better overall value for money.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 - RM-1110 |
| EDGE | Class 32 | No |
| GPRS | Class 32 | Yes |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2009, January. Released 2009, July | 2015, January. Released 2015, February |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 109.2 x 46 x 14 mm, 62 cc (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 in) | 116 x 50 x 12.9 mm (4.57 x 1.97 x 0.51 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) |
| Weight | 85 g (3.00 oz) | 78.6 g (2.75 oz) |
| | - | Flashlight |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~200 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.0 inches, 12.4 cm2 (~24.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~30.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | TFT, 256K colors |
| | 5-way navigation key | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls | Yes |
| Card slot | microSD (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32MB | 8MB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | 1000 entries |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | VGA |
| Video | 176x144@15fps | 240p@15fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| NFC | - | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Stereo FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | Rally Star, Soduko, Snake III, Diamond Rush | Yes |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, EMS, MMS, Email | SMS, MMS |
| | MP3/MP4 player
Organizer
Voice memo
Voice dial
Predictive text input | SNS applications
MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV/AAC player
Organizer
Voice memo
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 12 h | Up to 50 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 299 h | Up to 504 h |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h 25 min | Up to 20 h |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1020 mAh battery (BL-5C) | Li-Ion 1100 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jet Black, Mahogany Red, Frost Gray | Black, White, Green |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 30 EUR |
| SAR | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.11 W/kg (head) | 1.11 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
Nokia 2700 classic
- Classic Nokia design
- Simple and easy to use
- Durable build quality
- Affordable
- No camera
- Limited features
- Low screen resolution
- Potentially shorter battery life
Nokia 215 Dual SIM
- Dual SIM functionality
- Slightly longer battery life
- FM Radio
- Basic internet access (limited)
- Affordable
- Very basic camera
- Limited performance
- Low screen resolution
- Outdated design (compared to modern smartphones)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature small, basic LCD screens, likely around 2.4 inches. Expect low resolution and limited viewing angles. The 215 might have a slightly brighter display, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia 2700 Classic likely lacks a camera entirely. The Nokia 215 Dual SIM typically includes a very basic VGA camera, offering extremely low-resolution images suitable only for novelty purposes.
Performance
Performance will be limited on both devices, as they run on basic feature phone software. Expect slow navigation and limited multitasking capabilities. Neither phone is designed for demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Nokia 215 Dual SIM generally offers a longer battery life, potentially lasting for several days on a single charge, due to its more efficient components and software. The 2700 Classic's battery life is still respectable, but likely shorter.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 2700 Classic is ideal for those who prioritize a purely classic Nokia design and a very basic calling and texting experience. The Nokia 215 Dual SIM is a better choice for users needing dual SIM support, slightly longer battery life, and basic internet access.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for basic calling and texting?
Both are excellent for this purpose. The 215 offers dual SIM convenience, while the 2700 Classic has a more classic aesthetic.
❓ Can I use these phones for internet browsing?
Yes, both phones offer basic internet access, but the experience will be slow and limited due to the low processing power and small screen.
❓ Are these phones 4G compatible?
No, both phones are 2G devices and do not support 4G or 5G networks.
