Nokia's resurgence in the feature phone market continues with the 2660 Flip and 225 4G, both offering a nostalgic flip phone experience. But which one is the better choice for those seeking a simple, reliable device? This detailed comparison will break down the key differences to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 2660 Flip offers a more classic, premium feel with its charging cradle and slightly improved design. However, the Nokia 225 4G's 4G connectivity and potentially better performance due to its chipset give it an edge for modern users needing data access. It's a close call, but the 225 4G is slightly more versatile.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - EU, RUCIS | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40 - EU, APAC, SSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28 - LATAM, BR | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 28 - NA, LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 12 | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 28 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 124.7 x 51 x 13.7 mm (4.91 x 2.01 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 123 g (4.34 oz) | 90.1 g (3.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~28.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD, 256K colors |
| | Secondary external 1.77" display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | - |
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 (22 nm) | Unisoc UMS9117 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC |
| Internal | 128MB 48MB RAM | 128MB 64MB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 0.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio, built-in antenna |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | SMS(threaded view), MMS, IM |
| | - | MP3 player |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Compatible with a charging cradle | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1150 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Red, Lush Green, Pop Pink | Black, Classic Blue, Metallic Sand |
| Models | TA-1480, TA-1474, TA-1469 | TA-1321, TA-1296, TA-1279, TA-1276, TA-1282 |
| Price | € 59.99 / $ 190.00 / £ 69.00 / ₹ 4,499 | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | 0.47 W/kg (head) 1.16 W/kg (body) | 1.41 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.48 W/kg (body) | 1.63 W/kg (head) 1.79 W/kg (body) |
Nokia 2660 Flip
- Classic Flip Phone Design
- Dedicated Charging Cradle
- Slightly Larger Screen
- Simple and Easy to Use
- Good Battery Life
- Slower Processor
- Basic VGA Camera
- Limited Functionality
- No 4G Connectivity
Nokia 225 4G
- 4G Connectivity
- Potentially Better Performance
- Compact and Lightweight
- Dual SIM Support
- Good Battery Life
- Smaller Screen
- Basic VGA Camera
- Less Premium Feel
- Charging via Micro-USB
Display Comparison
Both phones feature small, basic LCD screens, typical of feature phones. The Nokia 2660 Flip's screen is slightly larger (2.8 inches) compared to the 225 4G's (1.45 inches). The 2660 Flip's screen also has a more modern look with a slightly higher resolution. Viewing angles and color reproduction are not strengths of either device.
Camera Comparison
Neither phone boasts a high-quality camera. The Nokia 2660 Flip has a basic VGA camera, while the Nokia 225 4G also has a VGA camera. Image quality is expected to be very low in both cases; these cameras are primarily for novelty.
Performance
The Nokia 225 4G's Unisoc UMS9117 chipset is generally considered to offer better performance than the 2660 Flip's Unisoc T107. While neither phone is a powerhouse, the 225 4G should handle basic tasks like texting and calling more smoothly. The 2660 Flip's CPU is older and slower.
Battery Life
Battery life is a strong point for both devices, typical of feature phones. The Nokia 2660 Flip likely has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering marginally longer talk time and standby time. Both should easily last for several days on a single charge with moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 2660 Flip is ideal for those prioritizing a classic design, ease of use, and a dedicated charging cradle. The Nokia 225 4G is better suited for users who want 4G connectivity for occasional internet browsing and data usage, and potentially a slightly faster experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Nokia 2660 Flip support 4G?
No, the Nokia 2660 Flip only supports 2G connectivity.
❓ Which phone is better for texting?
The Nokia 225 4G likely offers a slightly better texting experience due to its potentially faster processor.
❓ Can I use the Nokia 2660 Flip as a secondary phone?
Yes, both phones can be used as secondary phones, but the 225 4G's 4G connectivity makes it more useful for occasional data tasks.
