In a market saturated with smartphones, the Nokia 225 4G and Samsung E1200 Pusha represent a return to simplicity. However, they aren't identical. The Nokia 225 4G attempts to bridge the gap with 4G connectivity and a more modern chipset, while the Samsung E1200 Pusha prioritizes core functionality and extended standby time. This comparison dissects their differences to help you choose the right device for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users needing basic 4G connectivity for calls, texts, and occasional internet access, the Nokia 225 4G is the clear winner. Its Unisoc UMS9117 chipset provides a smoother experience and future-proofs the device against network sunsets. The Samsung E1200 Pusha remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme simplicity and potentially longer standby times.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | - |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40 - EU, APAC, SSA | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 28 - NA, LATAM | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 17 | 2012. Released 2012 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 124.7 x 51 x 13.7 mm (4.91 x 2.01 x 0.54 in) | 108 x 45 x 13.5 mm (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 90.1 g (3.17 oz) | 65.1 g (2.29 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~119 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~28.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.52 inches, 7.5 cm2 (~15.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 256K colors | TFT, 65K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | 156 MHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc UMS9117 | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC | No |
| Internal | 128MB 64MB RAM | - |
| Phonebook | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | No |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio, built-in antenna | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | Proprietary |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | No |
| Java | - | No |
| Messaging | SMS(threaded view), MMS, IM | SMS |
| | MP3 player | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 720 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 7 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 1150 mAh, removable | Removable Li-Ion 800 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Classic Blue, Metallic Sand | Black, White, Blue |
| Models | TA-1321, TA-1296, TA-1279, TA-1276, TA-1282 | - |
| Price | About 60 EUR | About 20 EUR |
| SAR | 1.41 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.63 W/kg (head) 1.79 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) |
Nokia 225 4G
- 4G Connectivity for faster data speeds
- More responsive user interface thanks to the Unisoc chipset
- Potential for future app compatibility
- Battery life may be shorter than the E1200 Pusha during standby
- Camera quality is likely basic
Samsung E1200 Pusha
- Extremely long standby time due to minimal power consumption
- Simplified user interface for ease of use
- Highly durable and reliable for basic communication
- Lack of 4G connectivity limits data speeds
- Slow processor can result in laggy performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a sophisticated display. Both likely utilize basic TFT panels with resolutions sufficient for text and simple icons. The Nokia 225 4G, being a slightly more recent device, may benefit from marginally better color reproduction, but the difference will be negligible. Bezels are substantial on both, reflecting their focus on durability and cost-effectiveness. Detailed specifications regarding brightness or color gamut are unavailable, but both are designed for readability, not immersive viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are unlikely to appeal to photography enthusiasts. While the Nokia 225 4G may include a camera, its image quality will be basic at best. The Samsung E1200 Pusha’s camera specifications are unavailable, but it’s reasonable to assume it’s similarly limited. Neither device offers features like optical image stabilization or advanced image processing. The primary use case for any camera on these devices is likely document capture or quick snapshots, not high-quality photography.
Performance
The performance disparity is significant. The Nokia 225 4G’s Unisoc UMS9117 chipset, while not a powerhouse, represents a substantial leap over the Samsung E1200 Pusha’s 156 MHz CPU. The Unisoc chip allows for smoother menu navigation, faster app loading (for the limited apps supported), and the ability to handle 4G connectivity without significant lag. The E1200 Pusha’s processor is adequate for basic calling and texting, but will struggle with anything beyond the most rudimentary tasks. The UMS9117 also likely incorporates a more efficient architecture, potentially impacting battery life positively during active use.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key consideration. The Samsung E1200 Pusha, with its simpler hardware and lack of 4G connectivity, likely boasts significantly longer standby times. However, the Nokia 225 4G’s more efficient Unisoc chipset may offset some of this advantage during active use. While specific mAh ratings are unavailable, the E1200 Pusha’s focus on core functionality suggests a design optimized for minimal power consumption. Charging times will be slow on both devices, given their basic charging circuitry.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 225 4G if you need 4G connectivity for voice calls, WhatsApp, or basic web browsing, and appreciate a slightly more responsive user interface. Buy the Samsung E1200 Pusha if you prioritize absolute simplicity, maximum standby time, and a device that's purely focused on core calling and texting functions, potentially for emergency use or users unfamiliar with smartphones.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia 225 4G support VoLTE in my region?
VoLTE (Voice over LTE) support varies by carrier and region. You'll need to check with your mobile network operator to confirm compatibility before purchasing the Nokia 225 4G. The Unisoc UMS9117 chipset *is* capable of VoLTE, but it requires carrier certification.
❓ Is the Samsung E1200 Pusha suitable for emergency use?
The Samsung E1200 Pusha is well-suited for emergency use due to its exceptionally long standby time and simple operation. Its focus on core calling and texting functionality ensures it will remain functional even with limited battery charging opportunities. However, the lack of 4G means emergency calls will rely on 2G/3G networks, which may be less reliable in some areas.
❓ Can I use WhatsApp on the Nokia 225 4G?
Yes, the Nokia 225 4G supports WhatsApp, along with other basic apps like Facebook and Opera Mini. The Unisoc UMS9117 chipset provides enough processing power to run these applications, although performance will be slower compared to a smartphone. The 4G connectivity ensures a reasonably responsive experience.
