The Nokia 2 V Tella and Samsung Galaxy A10e represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Nokia prioritizes software simplicity with Android Go, while the Samsung aims for a more feature-rich experience, albeit with a more demanding chipset. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for users seeking affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth multitasking and a slightly more responsive experience, the Samsung Galaxy A10e is the better choice. Its Exynos 7884 chipset, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Nokia 2 V Tella’s quad-core Helio A22. However, this comes at the expense of potentially shorter battery life and a less streamlined software experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - AT&T |
| 4G bands | LTE | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66 - AT&T |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Metro PCS, T-Mobile |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 21. Released 2020, October 21 | 2019, July. Released 2019, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.6 x 9.1 mm (5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 in) | 147.3 x 69.6 x 8.4 mm (5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~71.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.83 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (16 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, AF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/1.9, AF
or
5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0
or
2 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Black |
| Models | - | SM-A102U, SM-S102DL, SM-A102U1, SM-A102W, SM-A102N |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
Nokia 2 V Tella
- Longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Clean Android Go experience for simplicity
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly slower performance
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Less responsive user interface
Samsung Galaxy A10e
- Faster performance for smoother multitasking
- More conventional Android experience
- Better image processing capabilities
- Shorter battery life
- Potentially higher price
- More bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, the A10e’s chipset allows for potentially better image processing, resulting in slightly more vibrant colors. The Nokia 2 V Tella’s display is likely optimized for power efficiency, given the Helio A22’s limitations. While specific nit brightness isn’t provided, the A10e’s more powerful processor could drive a brighter panel under direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar in real-world usage, given the limitations of both sensors. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and a depth sensor. The A10e’s image signal processor (ISP), integrated within the Exynos 7884, will likely offer more sophisticated image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. However, the Nokia’s software optimization for its camera may compensate for the hardware deficit. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A10e is largely a marketing gimmick and offers minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy A10e’s Exynos 7884, built on a 14nm process, features an octa-core configuration (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53). This contrasts sharply with the Nokia 2 V Tella’s Mediatek Helio A22 (16nm) and its quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53. The A73 cores in the A10e offer significantly better single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 14nm process also contributes to better power efficiency compared to the Helio A22’s 16nm node, though the A10e’s more complex architecture will draw more power overall. Users who intend to run multiple apps or play even casual games will find the A10e a far more capable device.
Battery Life
The Nokia 2 V Tella, with its less demanding chipset, is likely to offer superior battery life. While specific battery capacities aren’t provided, the Helio A22’s lower power consumption will translate to longer screen-on time. The A10e’s Exynos 7884, despite being built on a smaller process node, is more power-hungry. Both devices support 10W wired charging, meaning charging times will be comparable – expect several hours for a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 2 V Tella if you need a phone that prioritizes simplicity, long battery life, and a clean software experience with Android Go. It’s ideal for first-time smartphone users or those who primarily use their phone for basic communication. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A10e if you prefer a more conventional Android experience and require better performance for light gaming, social media, and multitasking, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 7884 in the Galaxy A10e tend to overheat during prolonged use?
While the Exynos 7884 isn't a high-end processor, it's unlikely to overheat significantly during typical usage scenarios like browsing or social media. However, extended gaming sessions or running multiple demanding apps simultaneously could lead to some thermal throttling, reducing performance slightly. The Nokia 2 V Tella’s Helio A22 is less prone to overheating due to its lower power consumption.
❓ Is the Android Go edition on the Nokia 2 V Tella limiting for app compatibility?
Android Go is designed for devices with limited resources. While most popular apps have Go editions or are optimized to run on Go devices, some more demanding applications may not be fully compatible or may experience reduced functionality. However, for basic tasks like communication, web browsing, and social media, Android Go provides a smooth and efficient experience.
❓ How does the 10W charging affect the overall user experience on both phones?
10W charging is relatively slow by modern standards. Expect several hours (likely 3-5) to fully charge either device from 0%. This means overnight charging is highly recommended. The slower charging speed isn't a dealbreaker for these budget phones, as they are designed for users who prioritize battery life over quick top-ups.
