The Nokia 2 V Tella and Motorola Moto E6i represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. Both devices aim to deliver a functional Android experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with significantly different hardware. This comparison dissects the core differences between the Mediatek Helio A22 powering the Nokia and the Unisoc SC9863A in the Motorola, revealing which offers the better experience for basic smartphone tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a basic, reliable smartphone for calls, texts, and light app usage, the Motorola Moto E6i edges out the Nokia 2 V Tella. The Unisoc SC9863A’s octa-core configuration, despite its older 28nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Helio A22’s quad-core design, resulting in smoother multitasking and app loading.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 21. Released 2020, October 21 | 2021, February 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, February 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.6 x 9.1 mm (5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 in) | 155.6 x 73 x 8.5 mm (6.13 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~71.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (16 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, AF
2 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Titanium Gray, Pink |
| Models | - | XT2053-5 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Nokia 2 V Tella
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to 16nm process.
- Nokia's reputation for software updates (even on budget phones).
- Simpler, cleaner Android experience.
- Slower processor performance compared to the Moto E6i.
- Less responsive multitasking.
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A53).
Motorola Moto E6i
- Faster processor performance thanks to the octa-core Unisoc SC9863A.
- More responsive user experience.
- Newer CPU architecture (Cortex-A55).
- Less power-efficient 28nm process.
- Potentially shorter software support lifecycle.
- Motorola's software can include bloatware.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature basic LCD panels with resolutions around 720p+, typical for this price point. However, display quality isn't the defining factor here. The focus is on the underlying processors. We can assume both will have similar brightness levels, adequate for indoor use but struggling in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Both are likely to feature a primary camera around 8-13MP, accompanied by a basic depth sensor or a low-resolution macro lens. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but expect significant noise and lack of detail in low light. The Unisoc SC9863A might offer slightly better image processing capabilities due to its more powerful CPU, but the difference will be marginal. Focusing on the primary sensor's megapixel count is more relevant than any secondary lenses.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 2 V Tella utilizes the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22, a quad-core processor built on a more efficient 16nm process. Conversely, the Motorola Moto E6i features the Unisoc SC9863A, an octa-core chip fabricated on a less efficient 28nm node. While the 28nm process is less power-efficient, the eight cores (four at 1.6GHz and four at 1.2GHz) provide a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks. The Cortex-A55 cores in the Unisoc chip are also a generation newer than the Cortex-A53 cores in the Helio A22, offering improved performance per clock cycle. This translates to faster app launches and smoother scrolling on the Moto E6i.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. Battery capacity is not specified, but both are likely to house batteries around 3000-4000mAh. The more efficient 16nm process of the Helio A22 *could* translate to slightly better battery life under light usage, but the Unisoc chip’s ability to complete tasks faster might offset this by reducing screen-on time. Real-world battery life will heavily depend on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nokia 2 V Tella if you prioritize a potentially longer software support lifecycle, given Nokia’s generally cleaner Android experience and commitment to updates, even on budget devices. Buy the Motorola Moto E6i if you prefer a more responsive user experience for everyday tasks, benefiting from the octa-core processor’s ability to handle multiple apps simultaneously without significant slowdowns, even if the long-term software support is less certain.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto E6i struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Moto E6i won't deliver a flagship-level experience, the octa-core Unisoc SC9863A should handle Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. However, running multiple apps simultaneously or using resource-intensive features within these apps might cause slowdowns. It's designed for basic social media usage.
❓ Is the Nokia 2 V Tella a good choice for someone who primarily makes calls and sends texts?
Yes, the Nokia 2 V Tella is a perfectly adequate choice for basic communication. The Helio A22 is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and using simple apps. Its potential for slightly better battery life under light usage could be beneficial for users who prioritize talk time.
❓ Can either of these phones play modern mobile games?
Neither phone is suitable for demanding mobile games. While simple 2D games might be playable, modern 3D titles will likely experience significant lag and low frame rates. The integrated GPUs in both chipsets are simply not powerful enough.
❓ How long will software updates be available for the Motorola Moto E6i?
Motorola's software update commitment for the Moto E6i is limited. Expect at most one major Android version update and a few security patches. Nokia generally offers better long-term software support, even on its budget devices, making the 2 V Tella a potentially better choice for users concerned about security updates.
