Nokia 2 V Tella vs. Alcatel 1x (2019): A Deep Dive into Ultra-Budget Smartphones

The Nokia 2 V Tella and Alcatel 1x (2019) represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. Both devices offer basic functionality, but significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate real-world performance and usability. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for the price.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a functional, if basic, smartphone experience, the Nokia 2 V Tella emerges as the better choice. Its newer Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, fabricated on a smaller 16nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and improved efficiency over the Alcatel 1x’s older 28nm MT6739, making it more responsive for everyday tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names Nokia 2 V Tella alcatel 1x (2019)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - 5059A
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40 - 5008T
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - 5008Y
Launch
Announced2020, October 21. Released 2020, October 212019, January. Released 2019, Q1
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions150.6 x 71.6 x 9.1 mm (5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 in)146.4 x 68.8 x 8.3 mm (5.76 x 2.71 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight180 g (6.35 oz)130 g (4.59 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density)720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density)
Size5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~71.1% screen-to-body ratio)5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~77.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUQuad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (16 nm)Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8100
OSAndroid 10Android 8.1 (Oreo)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal16GB 2GB RAM16GB 2GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual8 MP, AF 2 MP13 MP 2 MP
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-LED flash
Single5 MP5 MP
Video720p@30fps720p
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted, 5008T only), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired-
TypeLi-Po 3000 mAh, removableLi-Ion 3000 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBluePebble Blue, Pebble Black
Models-5008T, 5008Y, 5008U, 5008R, 5008D_EEA, 5008Y_EEA, 5008D
PriceAbout 140 EURAbout 120 EUR

Nokia 2 V Tella

  • More efficient processor (Helio A22)
  • Likely smoother performance
  • Potentially longer battery life

  • Still a very basic smartphone
  • Limited camera capabilities

alcatel 1x (2019)

  • Extremely affordable
  • Functional for basic communication
  • Simple and easy to use

  • Outdated and inefficient processor (MT6739)
  • Slower performance
  • Potential for overheating

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, details regarding resolution and brightness are unavailable. The key difference lies in the underlying hardware powering the display, which is indirectly impacted by the chipset's efficiency. A more efficient chipset like the Helio A22 in the Nokia 2 V Tella can potentially allocate more resources to display processing, resulting in slightly smoother animations, though this is unlikely to be dramatically noticeable.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance on both devices is expected to be extremely limited. Details regarding sensor size and image processing are unavailable, but given the price point, expectations should be low. Both phones likely feature basic cameras suitable for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device means low-light performance will be particularly poor. Focusing on megapixel counts would be misleading; image quality is far more dependent on sensor size and software processing, neither of which are specified.

Performance

The Nokia 2 V Tella’s Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (16nm) is the clear winner in the performance category. While both phones feature a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU, the A22’s newer architecture and smaller fabrication process (16nm vs. 28nm for the Alcatel 1x’s MT6739) translate to better performance and power efficiency. The 28nm process of the MT6739 is significantly older and less efficient, leading to more heat generation and potential throttling under even moderate loads. This means the Nokia 2 V Tella will handle multitasking and app switching more smoothly, and for a longer duration, before experiencing performance slowdowns.

Battery Life

Battery life will largely depend on usage patterns, but the Nokia 2 V Tella benefits from the more efficient Helio A22 chipset. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the A22’s 16nm process will draw less power than the Alcatel 1x’s 28nm MT6739, resulting in longer battery life on a single charge. Both phones support 10W wired charging, meaning charging times will be relatively slow – expect several hours to fully charge from 0%.

Buying Guide

Buy the Nokia 2 V Tella if you need a slightly more responsive experience for basic tasks like messaging, web browsing, and social media. The newer chipset offers a smoother, less laggy experience. Buy the Alcatel 1x (2019) if you are on an extremely tight budget and simply need a phone for calls and very light use; it represents the absolute minimum viable smartphone experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Nokia 2 V Tella handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without significant lag?
The Nokia 2 V Tella’s Helio A22 chipset is capable of running these apps, but expect a basic experience. Scrolling may not be perfectly smooth, and loading times will be slower compared to more powerful devices. It’s suitable for casual use, but heavy users may experience frustration.
❓ Is the Alcatel 1x (2019) a good choice for someone who primarily uses their phone for making calls and sending texts?
Yes, the Alcatel 1x (2019) is a viable option for basic communication. Its primary function is to make and receive calls and send text messages, and it will perform these tasks adequately. However, be aware that its older processor may struggle with even simple tasks beyond these core functions.
❓ Can either of these phones run multiple apps simultaneously without slowing down?
Multitasking is limited on both devices. The Nokia 2 V Tella will handle a few apps slightly better due to its more efficient processor, but neither phone has enough RAM or processing power for extensive multitasking. Expect apps to reload frequently when switching between them.