Nokia's legacy of durable and reliable phones lives on with the 1661 and 1662. These feature phones offer a return to simplicity, focusing on calls and texts. But which one is the better choice for those seeking a no-frills communication device?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 1662 likely edges out the 1661 due to potentially improved battery life and slightly more modern design elements, though both offer exceptional value and durability. Both are excellent choices for basic communication and long battery life, prioritizing practicality over advanced features.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| | GSM 850 / 1900 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2008, November. Released 2009, Q2 | 2008, November. Released 2009, Q2 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 108 x 45 x 13.8 mm, 65.9 cc (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.54 in) | 108 x 45 x 13.8 mm, 58.8 cc (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 82 g (2.89 oz) | 82 g (2.89 oz) |
| | Flashlight | Flashlight |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 128 x 160 pixels (~114 ppi density) | 128 x 160 pixels (~114 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.8 inches, 10.2 cm2 (~21.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.8 inches, 10.2 cm2 (~21.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 65K colors | TFT, 65K colors |
| | Themes and wallpapers | Themes and wallpapers
Dust resistant keyboard |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 8MB | - |
| Phonebook | Up to 500 entries | 500 entries |
| | - | Up to 250 SMS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 2.5 mm audio jack | 2.5 mm audio jack |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | No | No |
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | No | No |
| Messaging | SMS(up to 250) | SMS(threaded view) |
| | Predictive text input
Organizer | Organizer
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 475 h | Up to 475 h |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h 10 min | Up to 4 h 10 min |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 860 mAh battery (BL-4C) | Removable Li-Ion 860 mAh battery (BL-4C) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Grey | Black, Blue |
| Price | About 30 EUR | About 30 EUR |
| SAR | 1.31 W/kg (head) 0.60 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.91 W/kg (head) | 1.38 W/kg (head) |
Nokia 1661
- Extremely Affordable
- Excellent Battery Life
- Durable Build Quality
- Simple and Easy to Use
- Very Basic Functionality
- No Camera
- Small Display
- Limited Features
Nokia 1662
- Good Battery Life
- Durable Build Quality
- Simple and Easy to Use
- Potentially Slightly More Modern Design
- Basic Functionality
- No Camera
- Small Display
- Limited Features
Display Comparison
Both the Nokia 1661 and 1662 likely feature a small, monochrome display, typical of feature phones. Expect a resolution suitable for displaying text and basic icons, prioritizing readability over visual fidelity. Differences are likely minimal, focusing on slight variations in screen size or bezel design.
Camera Comparison
Neither phone is expected to have a camera. These are basic communication devices, and camera functionality is not a priority.
Performance
Performance will be limited to basic call and text functionality. Neither phone will handle demanding applications. Expect similar performance levels, dictated by the basic processor and limited RAM. User experience will be focused on simplicity and ease of use.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key strength of both devices. Expect several days of usage on a single charge, thanks to the lack of power-hungry features. The 1662 may have a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially leading to marginally longer battery life.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 1661 is ideal for users who prioritize affordability and a truly basic phone experience. The Nokia 1662 is a better fit for those wanting slightly more modern aesthetics and potentially longer battery life without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the main difference between the Nokia 1661 and 1662?
The primary differences are likely subtle, potentially involving minor design variations and a possible slight improvement in battery life for the 1662. Both offer similar core functionality.
❓ Are these phones suitable for emergencies?
Yes, their long battery life and reliable call functionality make them excellent emergency phones. They are durable and can withstand harsh conditions.
