Looking for a simple, reliable, and affordable 4G phone? Nokia's feature phone lineup continues to deliver, with the 105 4G (2023) and 215 4G being popular choices. But which one is right for you? This comparison dives deep into their features and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia 215 4G edges out the 105 4G (2023) thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset (Unisoc UMS9117) and potentially better audio. Both offer excellent battery life and 4G connectivity, making them ideal for basic communication and occasional use, but the 215 offers a bit more.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40 - EU, APAC, SSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 28 - NA, LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 18 | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in) | 124.7 x 51 x 13.7 mm (4.91 x 2.01 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 93 g (3.28 oz) | 90.3 g (3.17 oz) |
| | Flashlight
Splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~28.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| Chipset | - | Unisoc UMS9117 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC |
| Internal | Unspecified | 128MB 64MB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio, built-in antenna |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS | SMS(threaded view), MMS, IM |
| | MP3 player | MP3 player |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1150 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Charcoal, Ocean Blue | Black, Cyan Green |
| Models | - | TA-1284, TA-1281, TA-1272, TA-1264 |
| Price | About 40 EUR | About 40 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.63 W/kg (head) 1.79 W/kg (body) |
Nokia 105 4G (2023)
- Extremely affordable
- Excellent battery life
- Simple and easy to use
- Durable build quality
- 4G connectivity
- Basic performance
- Low-resolution display
- Limited features
- Poor camera quality
- No advanced apps
Nokia 215 4G
- Slightly better performance than 105 4G
- Improved audio quality
- More features (e.g., FM radio)
- Good battery life
- 4G connectivity
- Still basic performance
- Low-resolution display
- Limited features
- Poor camera quality
- Slightly more expensive than 105 4G
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature small, basic LCD displays, probably around 1.8 inches. Expect similar resolution and viewing angles. The 215 4G might have slightly better color reproduction due to its slightly more advanced chipset, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Neither phone is expected to have a high-quality camera. Both likely have a basic VGA camera, offering very limited functionality. Image quality will be poor in low light. Don't expect to take stunning photos with either device.
Performance
The Nokia 215 4G has a clear advantage here with its Unisoc UMS9117 chipset. While neither phone is a powerhouse, the 215 should handle basic tasks like texting, calling, and light web browsing more smoothly than the 105 4G (2023), which likely uses a simpler, less powerful processor. Expect slightly faster app loading times on the 215.
Battery Life
Both Nokia phones are known for their exceptional battery life. Expect several days of use on a single charge with moderate usage. The 105 4G (2023) might have a slightly larger battery capacity, but the 215 4G's more efficient chipset could offset this.
Buying Guide
The Nokia 105 4G (2023) is perfect for users who prioritize extreme simplicity, long battery life, and the lowest possible price. The Nokia 215 4G is a better choice for those who want slightly improved performance, better audio quality, and a few more features without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Nokia 105 4G (2023) and the Nokia 215 4G?
The Nokia 215 4G has a slightly more powerful chipset, potentially better audio, and a few more features compared to the simpler Nokia 105 4G (2023). The 105 is generally cheaper.
❓ Are these phones good for social media?
While they support 4G, these phones are not ideal for heavy social media use. The limited processing power and small screens make browsing and using apps a frustrating experience. Basic texting and calling are their strengths.
