Nio Phone vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the more compelling choice. Its significantly faster 120W wired charging, coupled with a proven track record and excellent battery endurance (115h), outweighs the Nio Phone's ecosystem integration for the average consumer.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nio Phone | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 21 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 21 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g or 216 g (7.48 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | SkyUI | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.8x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD3.0, QC4 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5200 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Pink, Gold, Green, Blue, Dark Blue | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | N2301 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 820 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nio Phone
- Potentially slightly faster CPU performance due to higher clock speed.
- Integration with the Nio ecosystem for existing Nio users.
- 50W wireless charging offers convenience.
- Slower 66W wired charging compared to the Xiaomi 13 Pro.
- Limited information available on camera specifications.
- Battery life and capacity are currently unknown.
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging (19 minutes to full).
- Excellent battery endurance (115 hours).
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed compared to the Nio Phone.
- No unique ecosystem integration beyond Xiaomi's own.
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Xiaomi).
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a brighter display, peaking at 1253 nits, compared to an unlisted peak brightness for the Nio Phone. While both likely utilize high-quality AMOLED panels, the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Both devices likely feature adaptive refresh rates, but the Xiaomi’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), suggesting excellent black levels. The Nio Phone’s display specifications are currently incomplete, making a definitive comparison challenging.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given Xiaomi’s history, the 13 Pro likely features a sophisticated multi-camera system with a large main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. The Nio Phone’s camera system remains a mystery, and its image quality is currently unknown. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. We can assume both will offer competitive performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be a key differentiator.
Performance
Both the Nio Phone and Xiaomi 13 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm SM8550-AC/AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). However, the Nio Phone’s CPU is clocked slightly higher at 3.36 GHz for the Cortex-X3 prime core versus the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 3.2 GHz. This marginal clock speed difference may yield a small performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks, but real-world differences are likely minimal. Both utilize the same core configuration (1x Cortex-X3, 2x Cortex-A715, 2x Cortex-A710, 3x Cortex-A510). Thermal management will be crucial; the 4nm process helps, but sustained loads could induce throttling. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s larger user base provides more data on long-term performance stability.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Nio Phone’s 66W wired charging, while still fast, is considerably slower. The Xiaomi also offers 50W wireless charging (36 minutes to full) matching the Nio Phone, and both support 10W reverse wireless charging. Crucially, the Xiaomi 13 Pro achieves an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating excellent battery life in real-world usage, while the Nio Phone’s battery capacity and endurance are currently unknown. The Xiaomi’s combination of fast charging and long endurance makes it the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nio Phone if you are deeply invested in the Nio electric vehicle ecosystem and prioritize seamless integration with your car and other Nio devices. The 66W wired and 50W wireless charging, while not class-leading, are sufficient for most, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides ample performance. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prioritize raw charging speed, long battery life, and a mature software experience. Its 120W charging is a game-changer, and the 115-hour endurance rating ensures all-day usability.