Nio Phone vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly faster 100W wired charging and competitive wireless charging speeds, coupled with a brighter display, provide a more convenient and visually immersive experience. However, the Nio Phone remains a compelling option, particularly for those prioritizing a balanced package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nio Phone | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 21 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 21 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g or 216 g (7.48 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | SkyUI | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.8x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD3.0, QC4 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Pink, Gold, Green, Blue, Dark Blue | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | N2301 | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 820 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nio Phone
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed (potentially marginal gains)
- Balanced feature set
- Solid Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Slower wired and wireless charging
- Display likely less bright than Oppo
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Significantly faster 100W wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Competitive 50W wireless charging
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed (likely negligible)
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1318 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight, a crucial advantage for outdoor users. While the Nio Phone’s display specifications are not provided, the Find X6 Pro’s brightness level suggests a significant advantage. Both devices likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life, but the Oppo’s higher peak brightness is a clear differentiator. Contrast ratio is infinite (nominal) on the Oppo, suggesting excellent black levels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Both are described as having Photo/Video capabilities. Without specific details on sensor size, aperture, or OIS implementation, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of information regarding megapixel counts or specialized lenses (ultrawide, telephoto) prevents a thorough assessment. It's safe to assume both phones offer competitive image quality, but the Oppo’s brand reputation suggests a potentially more refined image processing pipeline.
Performance
Both the Nio Phone and Oppo Find X6 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8550-AC/AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Nio Phone’s CPU clocks slightly higher at 3.36 GHz versus the Oppo’s 3.2 GHz, but this difference is unlikely to be perceptible in most real-world scenarios. Both utilize the same core configuration (1x Cortex-X3, 2x Cortex-A715, 2x Cortex-A710, 3x Cortex-A510). The 4nm process node ensures excellent thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. RAM specifications are not provided for either device, but both are expected to utilize fast LPDDR5x memory.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature. Its 100W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 30 minutes, with a 45% charge achieved in only 10 minutes. Wireless charging is also faster at 50W (100% in 51 minutes) compared to the Nio Phone’s 50W wireless. The Nio Phone offers 66W wired charging, which is respectable but slower. Both devices support 10W reverse wireless charging. Both phones have an endurance rating of 114h, suggesting similar battery life despite the charging speed differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nio Phone if you value a well-rounded flagship experience with solid performance and a good balance of features. It's ideal for users who appreciate a dependable device without necessarily needing the absolute fastest charging or brightest screen. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prioritize rapid charging – both wired and wireless – and demand a display that excels in outdoor visibility. This phone is geared towards power users and multimedia enthusiasts.