Nio Phone vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Android Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and blazing-fast charging, the Nio Phone is the clear winner. However, the Pixel 7 Pro’s refined software, computational photography, and established ecosystem make it the better choice for those valuing a seamless, AI-enhanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nio Phone | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 21 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 21 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 212 g or 216 g (7.48 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | SkyUI | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.8x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD3.0, QC4 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5200 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Pink, Gold, Green, Blue, Dark Blue | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | N2301 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 820 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Nio Phone
- Significantly faster charging speeds (66W wired, 50W wireless)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
- Camera performance details currently unknown
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera image processing and computational photography
- Polished and intuitive software experience
- Strong integration with Google’s ecosystem
- Slower charging speeds (23W wired, 23W wireless)
- Less powerful processor (Tensor G2)
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Nio Phone’s display specs are currently unavailable, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable brightness level given its flagship positioning. Both devices likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. Without Nio Phone display specs, a direct comparison of color accuracy and bezel size is impossible, but the Pixel 7 Pro is known for its well-calibrated display.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with capable camera systems, but approach image capture differently. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography prowess, delivering consistently excellent results with its photo and video capabilities. While specific sensor details for the Nio Phone are missing, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is highly capable. The Pixel 7 Pro’s strength lies in its software algorithms, enhancing dynamic range and detail. Without knowing the Nio Phone’s sensor sizes and apertures, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance, but the Pixel 7 Pro is a known leader in this area. We'll ignore any 2MP macro lenses on either device as they offer minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The Nio Phone’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a significant leap in performance over the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.36 GHz, outpaces the Pixel’s Cortex-X1 cores (2.85 GHz). The more modern CPU architecture of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, combined with the 4nm process node, translates to superior thermal efficiency and sustained performance under load. This means less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 7 Pro relies on Google’s AI and machine learning capabilities within the Tensor G2, excelling in tasks like voice recognition and image processing, but falls behind in raw computational power.
Battery Life
Both the Nio Phone and Pixel 7 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity. However, the Nio Phone’s charging capabilities are dramatically faster, supporting 66W wired charging, capable of a full charge in under 40 minutes, and 50W wireless charging. The Pixel 7 Pro is limited to 23W wired and wireless charging, taking approximately 30 minutes to reach 50% charge. The Nio Phone also offers 10W reverse wireless charging, a feature present on the Pixel 7 Pro, allowing it to charge accessories. The Nio Phone’s faster charging speeds provide a significant convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nio Phone if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of 66W wired and 50W wireless charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a polished software experience, exceptional camera image processing, and integration with Google’s suite of services, even if it means sacrificing some raw speed.