Nio Phone 2 vs OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Performance, Charging, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the Nio Phone 2 is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. However, the OnePlus 12R delivers exceptional value with its 100W charging and impressive 14:32 hour active use battery life, making it the more practical choice for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Nio Phone 2 | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 27 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 27 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 77.5 x 8.5 / 8.6 / 8.7 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 / 214 / 226 g (7.37 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | SkyUI 2.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.6x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.3, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Blue, Moonlight Silver, Pine Green, Golden Sand, Nebula Red, EPedition | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | N2301 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 820 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Nio Phone 2
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for top-tier performance
- 50W Wireless Charging offers convenience
- Potential for advanced camera features (based on flagship positioning)
- 80W wired charging is slower than OnePlus 12R
- Battery life is currently unknown and potentially lower than 12R
OnePlus 12R
- 100W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Excellent 14:32h active use battery life
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Uses a previous-generation chipset
- May not offer the same level of future-proofing as the Nio Phone 2
Display Comparison
While both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, display details are limited for the Nio Phone 2. The OnePlus 12R boasts a measured peak brightness of 1181 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Without comparable data for the Nio Phone 2, it’s difficult to assess its outdoor performance. The OnePlus 12R’s panel likely employs LTPO technology, enabling variable refresh rates for improved efficiency, a feature we expect to see in flagship devices, but cannot confirm on the Nio Phone 2.
Camera Comparison
Context data lacks camera specifics for both devices. Given the Nio Phone 2’s flagship positioning, we anticipate a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. However, without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible. The OnePlus 12R likely features a capable camera setup, but its image processing style may lean towards more saturated colors, a common OnePlus trait. We’d need to analyze sample photos to determine which phone delivers more accurate and pleasing results.
Performance
The Nio Phone 2’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, represents a significant leap over the OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The 8 Gen 3’s CPU configuration – 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 – offers improved single-core and multi-core performance compared to the 12R’s 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. However, the 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus 12R is still a powerhouse, and its thermal management, combined with the 4nm node, should prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines with its 100W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 26 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Nio Phone 2’s 80W wired charging. The 12R also boasts an impressive 14:32h active use battery score, indicating excellent endurance. While the Nio Phone 2 offers 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, the OnePlus 12R’s faster wired charging and proven battery life provide a more convenient and reliable experience for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Nio Phone 2 if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like video editing, high-end gaming, or AI applications, and are willing to potentially trade off some battery endurance. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize all-day battery life, incredibly fast charging, and a balanced experience without sacrificing significant performance, all at a potentially lower price point.