Nio Phone 2 vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Flagships

Both the Nio Phone 2 and Honor Magic6 Pro represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone technology, powered by the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. However, they target slightly different priorities: the Nio Phone 2 appears to lean towards a more holistic user experience, while the Honor Magic6 Pro emphasizes battery endurance and display technology. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device reigns supreme.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a stunning display, the Honor Magic6 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 14:06 active use score significantly surpasses what we'd expect from the Nio Phone 2, and the 1578 nits peak brightness is a clear advantage. However, the Nio Phone 2's faster 80W wired and 50W wireless charging offer a compelling alternative for those who value speed over longevity.

PHONES
Phone Names Nio Phone 2 Honor Magic6 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42LTE
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSASA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, July 272024, January 11
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, July 27Available. Released 2024, January 18
Body
Build-Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather)
Dimensions163.9 x 77.5 x 8.5 / 8.6 / 8.7 mm162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight209 / 214 / 226 g (7.37 oz)225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2NanoCrystal Shield
Resolution1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)
Size6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak)LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 750
OSSkyUI 2.0Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, Ring-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.6x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.3, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR10+4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video
Selfie camera
Single12 MP, f/2.5, (wide)50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Lossless5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 5020 mAhSi/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh
Misc
ColorsSpace Blue, Moonlight Silver, Pine Green, Golden Sand, Nebula Red, EPeditionBlack, Green, Blue, Purple, White
ModelsN2301BVL-AN16, BVL-N49
PriceAbout 820 EUR€ 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99

Nio Phone 2

  • Faster 80W wired charging
  • Higher 50W wireless charging speed
  • Potential for optimized thermal management (based on brand)
  • Automotive integration features (speculative)

  • Unknown battery life performance
  • Missing display brightness specifications
  • Limited camera details available

Honor Magic6 Pro

  • Exceptional 14:06 hour battery life
  • Industry-leading 1578 nits peak display brightness
  • 66W wireless charging
  • Likely refined software experience

  • Slower 5W reverse wired charging
  • 80W wired charging is standard, not groundbreaking
  • Camera specs remain unknown

Display Comparison

The Honor Magic6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1578 nits peak brightness. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, offering a far superior experience in direct sunlight compared to the Nio Phone 2 (brightness data unavailable). While both phones likely utilize high refresh rate panels, the Honor’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator. The absence of detailed display specs for the Nio Phone 2 makes a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel technology (LTPO vs. non-LTPO) impossible, but the Magic6 Pro’s brightness sets a high bar.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a comprehensive comparison is limited. However, the market positioning of both phones suggests a focus on high-quality imaging. The absence of sensor size or aperture information prevents a meaningful analysis. We can assume both will feature multi-camera systems, but the quality of image processing and low-light performance will be critical differentiators. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary lenses (like 2MP macros), the main sensor and its associated optics will be the deciding factors.

Performance

Both the Nio Phone 2 and Honor Magic6 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an identical CPU configuration: 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. Performance will likely be dictated by thermal management and sustained clock speeds. The Nio Phone 2’s automotive background *could* suggest a focus on robust thermal solutions, but without testing data, it’s speculative. Both devices will likely benefit from LPDDR5x RAM, though specific speeds are not provided.

Battery Life

The Honor Magic6 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional battery life, achieving a 14:06 hour active use score. This is a significant advantage over what we anticipate from the Nio Phone 2, which lacks published battery life data. While both phones support 80W wired charging, the Honor Magic6 Pro also offers 66W wireless charging, a substantial improvement over the Nio Phone 2’s 50W wireless charging. The Nio Phone 2 compensates with 10W reverse wireless charging, while the Honor Magic6 Pro offers 5W reverse wired charging. For users prioritizing minimizing downtime, the Nio Phone 2’s faster charging speeds are appealing, but the Honor’s longer runtime is more valuable for extended use.

Buying Guide

Buy the Nio Phone 2 if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and appreciate a brand pushing boundaries in automotive integration. Its 80W wired and 50W wireless charging are ideal for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you prioritize exceptional battery life, a brighter and more visible display in direct sunlight, and a more refined, all-around flagship experience. It’s the better choice for users who want a phone that reliably lasts a full day and beyond.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in either phone exhibit thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While both phones utilize the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, thermal performance will depend on their cooling solutions. Without independent testing, it's difficult to say definitively. The Nio Phone 2’s potential automotive-inspired thermal design *could* offer an advantage, but the Honor Magic6 Pro’s larger chassis might provide more space for heat dissipation.
❓ How does the 66W wireless charging on the Honor Magic6 Pro compare to typical wireless charging speeds?
66W wireless charging is exceptionally fast, significantly exceeding the 50W offered by the Nio Phone 2 and the 15-20W commonly found in other flagship devices. This means the Honor Magic6 Pro can wirelessly charge from 0-100% much faster, reducing downtime and offering a more convenient charging experience.
❓ Is the reverse wireless charging feature on either phone useful for charging accessories like earbuds?
Both phones offer reverse wireless charging, but at different wattages (10W for Nio, 5W for Honor). While convenient for topping up small accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, the slower speeds mean it's not a practical replacement for traditional charging methods. The Nio Phone 2’s higher wattage offers a slightly faster experience.