Motorola Razr+ 2025 vs. vivo X Flip: A Deep Dive into the Foldable Future
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, ensuring smoother multitasking and gaming. While the vivo X Flip boasts a brighter display, the Razr+'s newer silicon and faster charging offer a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr+ 2025 | vivo X Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2023, April 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 03 | Available. Released 2023, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) | Aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.3 x 7.8 mmFolded: 86.4 x 75.3 x 16.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Cover display: AMOLED, 3 inches, 422 x 682 pixels, 14.5:9 ratio | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 106˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired | 44W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black |
| Models | XT2451-1 | V2256A |
| Price | $ 500.00 | About 800 EUR |
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Newer, more powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Faster 45W wired charging and wireless charging support
- Potential for longer software support due to newer hardware
- Slightly lower battery endurance based on active use score
- Display brightness currently unknown, potentially lower than vivo X Flip
vivo X Flip
- Brighter 1027 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- Strong battery endurance rating of 110 hours
- Proven and refined software experience
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Slower 44W wired charging only
Display Comparison
The vivo X Flip immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1027 nits, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. While the Razr+ 2025’s display specs are currently unknown, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. Both devices utilize foldable OLED panels, but the X Flip’s brightness suggests a more robust panel capable of handling direct sunlight. The X Flip’s display is also likely to have a higher pixel density, contributing to sharper visuals, though this is speculative without Razr+ 2025 display specs. The absence of LTPO information for the Razr+ 2025 is concerning; if it lacks adaptive refresh rate technology, it will impact battery life.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by the lack of specific camera specs for both devices beyond 'Photo / Video' for the vivo X Flip. However, the market positioning suggests the Razr+ 2025 will likely feature a more advanced camera system. The X Flip’s image processing is known for its vibrant colors and strong dynamic range, but the older chipset may limit its computational photography capabilities. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Razr+ 2025’s newer ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 gives it an edge in image quality and low-light performance. We'll need to see sample images to make a proper judgement.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a clear generational leap over the vivo X Flip’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 8s Gen 3 features a newer Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, compared to the X Flip’s Cortex-X2 at 3.0 GHz. This, combined with the newer Cortex-A720 and A520 cores in the Razr+, translates to improved single-core and multi-core performance. The 4nm process node on both chips offers good efficiency, but the architectural improvements in the 8s Gen 3 should result in better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The X Flip’s older chipset, while still capable, will struggle with the latest graphically intensive games and applications.
Battery Life
The vivo X Flip boasts an endurance rating of 110 hours, a strong indicator of battery life. The Motorola Razr+ 2025, with an active use score of 10:12h, translates to roughly 96 hours of endurance, slightly less than the X Flip. However, the Razr+ 2025 compensates with significantly faster charging: 45W wired, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wired, compared to the X Flip’s 44W wired charging. This means the Razr+ 2025 can top up much quicker, mitigating the slightly smaller endurance. The addition of wireless and reverse wireless charging on the Razr+ 2025 adds convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you prioritize performance for demanding apps and games, and value the benefits of a more recent chipset with potential for longer software support. Buy the vivo X Flip if you are highly sensitive to screen brightness and prefer a device with a potentially more optimized battery experience, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.