Motorola Razr+ 2025 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2: Which Flip Phone Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a refined software experience, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset provides a noticeable edge in processing power, despite the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 offering superior battery endurance and significantly faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr+ 2025 | Tecno Phantom V Flip2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2024, September 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 03 | Available. Released 2024, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm | Unfolded: 170.8 x 73.4 x 7.6 mmFolded: 87.8 x 73.4 x 16 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, HIOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired | 70W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 4000 mAh | 4720 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Models | XT2451-1 | - |
| Price | $ 500.00 | - |
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- More powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Wireless and reverse wired charging capabilities
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Slower wired charging speed
- Display brightness likely lower than Phantom V Flip2
Tecno Phantom V Flip2
- Longer battery life (11:37h active use)
- Significantly faster 70W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness (893 nits)
- Less powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset
- 6nm process may result in more heat under load
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Tecno Phantom V Flip2 boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 893 nits. While the Razr+ 2025’s display specs are currently unknown, this difference is immediately noticeable in outdoor visibility. Both phones likely employ OLED panels for vibrant colors, but the Phantom V Flip2’s higher peak brightness provides a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. The absence of LTPO information for the Razr+ 2025 raises questions about its adaptive refresh rate capabilities, potentially impacting battery efficiency compared to a confirmed LTPO panel on the Phantom V Flip2.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Razr+ 2025, a direct comparison is limited. However, the focus should be on the main sensor size and image processing capabilities. The Phantom V Flip2’s camera system is likely optimized for social media sharing, prioritizing quick capture and vibrant colors. The Razr+ 2025, given Motorola’s history, may lean towards a more natural image processing style. The absence of information regarding OIS on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. We anticipate both phones will include standard ultrawide and selfie cameras, but the main sensor’s quality will be the defining factor.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 is powered by the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts with the Tecno Phantom V Flip2’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) and its Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 2.6 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to sustained performance during intensive tasks. While the Dimensity 8020 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s architectural advantages, particularly the newer Cortex-X4 core, provide a clear performance lead, especially in GPU-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Flip2 takes a clear lead in battery life, achieving an active use score of 11:37h compared to the Razr+ 2025’s 10:12h. This difference, while not massive, is significant for all-day usability. Furthermore, the Phantom V Flip2’s 70W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 45 minutes, is substantially faster than the Razr+ 2025’s 45W charging. The Razr+ 2025 does offer 15W wireless and 5W reverse wired charging, providing added convenience, but the Phantom V Flip2’s charging speed is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you need a snappy, responsive experience for demanding apps and gaming, and value the Qualcomm ecosystem. You'll benefit from the 4nm process node for better thermal management. Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 if you prioritize all-day battery life and incredibly fast charging, and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful chipset. It's the ideal choice for users who heavily rely on their phone throughout the day and want to minimize downtime.