Motorola Razr+ 2025 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: A Deep Dive into Foldable Innovation
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 42:04h endurance and 1471 nits peak brightness outweigh the Razr+'s performance edge. However, power users demanding maximum processing power will find the Razr+ 2025 a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr+ 2025 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2025, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 03 | Available. Released 2025, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm | Unfolded: 166.7 x 75.2 x 6.5 mmFolded: 85.5 x 75.2 x 13.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + multiple eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Mohs level 1 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 111.2 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | 10-core (1x3.3GHz Cortex-X5 & 2x2.74GHz Cortex-A725 & 5x2.36GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Exynos 2500 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Xclipse 950 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired | 25W wired, QC2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink | Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint |
| Models | XT2451-1 | SM-F766B, SM-F766B/DS, SM-F766U, SM-F766U1 |
| Price | $ 500.00 | $ 799.99 / C$ 1,100.00 / £ 849.00 / € 759.00 / ₹ 109,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.22 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:04h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (210 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Faster processor for demanding tasks
- 45W wired charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially better thermal management
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Display brightness and quality unknown
- Long-term battery health unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- Exceptional battery life and endurance
- Bright and color-accurate display (1471 nits)
- Long-lasting battery with 2000 charge cycles
- Slightly less powerful processor
- Slower wired charging (25W)
- Exynos chip may be prone to throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1471 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Razr+ 2025 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize foldable OLED technology, Samsung’s panel likely benefits from improved LTPO efficiency, contributing to its superior battery endurance. The Z Flip7’s color accuracy is also expected to be higher, given Samsung’s display expertise. The Razr+ 2025’s display specs are currently unknown, but it will need to match or exceed Samsung’s brightness to compete effectively.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond sensor counts are unavailable for both devices. However, given the market positioning, we can expect both to feature capable main sensors. The Z Flip7 likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms, known for vibrant colors and strong dynamic range. The Razr+ 2025 may prioritize computational photography enhancements leveraging the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP. Without specific aperture and sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Samsung’s history suggests a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 is equipped with the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7’s Exynos 2500 (3nm) 10-core processor. The Exynos 2500’s 3nm process node theoretically offers better power efficiency, but the Razr+'s Cortex-X4 core provides a performance advantage in single-core tasks. The Z Flip7’s 10-core configuration suggests a focus on multi-threaded performance, potentially benefiting productivity apps. However, the 4nm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Razr+ 2025 is likely to deliver superior sustained performance due to better thermal management, minimizing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 truly shines. Its impressive 42:04h endurance and 11:52h active use score significantly outperform the Motorola Razr+ 2025’s 10:12h active use score. While the Razr+ 2025 offers faster 45W wired charging, the Z Flip7’s 25W charging with QC2.0 and 50% charge in 30 minutes is still competitive. The Z Flip7 also boasts a remarkable 2000 charge cycles, indicating exceptional long-term battery health. The Razr+ 2025’s 15W wireless and 5W reverse wired charging are adequate, but the Z Flip7’s 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless offer similar functionality.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you need a foldable that can handle demanding tasks like mobile gaming or video editing without significant throttling, and you don't mind sacrificing some battery life for that performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 if you prioritize all-day battery life, a stunningly bright and color-accurate display for media consumption, and a more refined, long-lasting foldable experience, even if it means slightly less raw processing power.