Motorola Razr+ 2024 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a robust camera system, all-day battery life, and a mature software experience, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Motorola Razr+ 2024 offers a compelling alternative for those captivated by the foldable form factor and willing to trade some performance and battery longevity for a truly unique device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr+ 2024 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 25 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 17 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Hot Pink, Spring Green, Peach Fuzz, Paris Hilton Edition | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | - | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | $ 260.99 | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Razr+ 2024
- Innovative foldable design
- Compact and pocketable when folded
- Unique user experience
- Likely lower battery life
- Potentially less powerful processor
- Durability concerns with folding screen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Exceptional camera performance
- Long-lasting battery life
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor
- Traditional slab design
- Larger and heavier
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1447 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Razr+ 2024’s display specs aren’t provided, foldable displays generally prioritize flexibility over peak brightness. The S24 Ultra’s likely use of LTPO technology allows for dynamic refresh rate scaling, conserving battery life, a feature expected but unconfirmed on the Razr+. The Razr+'s folding screen is its defining feature, offering a larger immersive experience when unfolded, but at the cost of a visible crease and potentially lower durability compared to the S24 Ultra’s flat, Gorilla Glass Armor protected display.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices, but Samsung’s S24 Ultra is renowned for its exceptional camera system. We anticipate a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities compared to the Razr+. The S24 Ultra’s camera system likely includes sophisticated features like 8K video recording and advanced zoom capabilities. While the Razr+ 2024 will likely offer a competent camera experience, it’s unlikely to match the S24 Ultra’s image quality, versatility, and low-light performance. The absence of details on the Razr+'s camera suggests it isn't a primary selling point.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset, with its 1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 prime core and higher clock speeds across the A720 cores, demonstrably outperforms the Motorola Razr+ 2024’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm). The S24 Ultra’s CPU configuration (8-core) is also more aggressive than the Razr+'s (Octa-core 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520). While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the Gen 3 offers architectural improvements and higher clock speeds, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The S24 Ultra’s likely inclusion of faster LPDDR5x RAM further enhances its performance advantage. Thermal management will be crucial for the S24 Ultra to sustain peak performance, but its larger chassis provides more surface area for heat dissipation.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s active use score of 13:49h demonstrates impressive battery life, a significant advantage over what we expect from the Razr+ 2024. Foldable phones typically have smaller battery capacities to accommodate the folding mechanism. Both devices support 45W wired charging, with the S24 Ultra claiming 65% charge in 30 minutes. The S24 Ultra also offers 15W wireless charging (Qi) and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, while the Razr+ 2024 offers 15W wireless and 5W reverse wired. The S24 Ultra’s larger battery and optimized power management provide a clear advantage for users who demand all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2024 if you crave a head-turning design, value the convenience of a compact, pocketable form factor when folded, and are an early adopter comfortable with the potential software quirks of a newer technology. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you demand the best possible camera performance, require exceptional battery life for power users, and prefer a polished, feature-rich software experience with long-term support.