Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: A Deep Dive into Foldable Supremacy
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and multitasking, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 emerges as the stronger contender. Its impressive 40:28h endurance and optimized software experience outweigh the Razr Ultra 2025’s faster charging, making it ideal for power users. However, the Razr Ultra’s more compact form factor appeals to those seeking portability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2025, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Available. Released 2025, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Ceramic), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.5 x 74 x 7.2 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.7 mm | Unfolded: 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.2 mmFolded: 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + multiple eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Mohs level 1 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2912 pixels (~464 ppi density) | 1968 x 2184 pixels (~368 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 106.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 204.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.6µm, PDAF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, Dolby Vision HDR, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps (gyro-EIS), 10-bit HDR, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wired | 25W wired, QC2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet Black, Mint |
| Models | - | SM-F966B, SM-F966B/DS, SM-F966U, SM-F966U1 |
| Price | $ 749.99 | € 1,367.99 / $ 1,399.99 / £ 1,449.00 / ₹ 174,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.24 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.42 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 40:28h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (210 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- Faster 68W wired charging for quick top-ups
- More compact and pocketable design
- Potentially more stylish clamshell form factor
- Likely shorter battery life compared to Z Fold7
- Limited battery endurance data available
- Smaller display real estate for multitasking
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Exceptional 40:28h battery endurance
- Larger, more versatile foldable display
- Proven 2000 charge cycle battery longevity
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Bulkier and less pocketable design
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
The Galaxy Z Fold7 boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1408 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Razr Ultra 2025’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to prioritize a more compact form factor over sheer brightness. The Z Fold7’s larger internal display is geared towards productivity, while the Razr Ultra’s external display is designed for quick interactions. Both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life, but the Z Fold7’s larger panel demands more power.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Razr Ultra 2025, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically excels in image processing and sensor technology. The Z Fold7 likely features a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced features like OIS. The focus should be on the main sensor size and aperture, as these directly impact low-light performance and image quality. Ignoring the prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices, the overall image processing pipeline will likely be a key differentiator.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8750-AB/AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores at slightly different clock speeds (4.32 GHz for Razr vs 4.47 GHz for Fold7). The marginal CPU clock speed difference is unlikely to translate to a noticeable real-world performance gap. The key difference lies in thermal management; Samsung’s experience with foldable designs may allow for more effective heat dissipation, potentially preventing throttling during sustained workloads. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7’s battery endurance of 40:28h and active use score of 11:44h are substantial advantages. While the Razr Ultra 2025 offers faster wired charging at 68W compared to the Z Fold7’s 25W, the Z Fold7’s larger battery capacity and optimized power efficiency provide a more reliable all-day experience. The Z Fold7’s 2000 charge cycle rating also indicates superior long-term battery health. The Razr Ultra’s 30W wireless charging is competitive, but the Z Fold7’s longevity is a significant benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 if you need a highly portable, pocketable foldable that prioritizes style and quick top-ups with its 68W charging. It’s perfect for users who value one-handed operation and a more traditional smartphone experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 if you prefer a larger, tablet-like display for multitasking, content creation, and immersive media consumption, and require all-day battery life with a proven track record of 2000 charge cycles.