Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset offers a significant advantage. However, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 excels in battery life and real-world usability, making it the better choice for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2025, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Available. Released 2025, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Ceramic), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.5 x 74 x 7.2 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.7 mm | Unfolded: 166.7 x 75.2 x 6.5 mmFolded: 85.5 x 75.2 x 13.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + multiple eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Mohs level 1 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2912 pixels (~464 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 106.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 111.2 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | 10-core (1x3.3GHz Cortex-X5 & 2x2.74GHz Cortex-A725 & 5x2.36GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Exynos 2500 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Xclipse 950 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.6µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, Dolby Vision HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wired | 25W wired, QC2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint |
| Models | - | SM-F766B, SM-F766B/DS, SM-F766U, SM-F766U1 |
| Price | $ 749.99 | $ 799.99 / C$ 1,100.00 / £ 849.00 / € 759.00 / ₹ 109,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.14 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.22 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:04h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (210 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- Significantly faster processor with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Faster wired charging at 68W
- Potential for superior gaming performance
- Battery life data currently unavailable, potentially lower than Z Flip7
- Display brightness data unavailable, potentially less visible outdoors
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- Exceptional battery life with 42:04h endurance
- Bright 1471 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- Long-term battery health with 2000 charge cycles
- Exynos 2500 may throttle under sustained load
- Slower wired charging at 25W
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1471 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Razr Ultra 2025 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, Samsung’s panel is demonstrably superior in peak brightness. The Z Flip7’s display is also likely to benefit from Samsung’s established color calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction. Bezels are a critical area for foldables, and a detailed side-by-side comparison is needed to determine which device minimizes them more effectively.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Razr Ultra 2025, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Z Flip7’s camera system likely focuses on computational photography and Samsung’s image processing algorithms. The absence of detailed sensor information for the Razr Ultra 2025 suggests a focus on software optimization, but the Z Flip7’s established camera reputation gives it an initial edge. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Z Flip7 is a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. We would need to see detailed specs for the Razr Ultra 2025 to assess its camera capabilities accurately.
Performance
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite, with its Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU cores (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz), is architecturally designed for superior performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7’s Exynos 2500 (1x3.3GHz Cortex-X5, 2x2.74GHz Cortex-A725, 5x2.36GHz Cortex-A725, 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process node and Oryon cores promise significant gains in both CPU and GPU performance. The Exynos 2500, while also on a 3nm node, utilizes ARM’s standard core designs. This difference translates to a likely advantage in sustained performance for the Razr Ultra 2025, potentially mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Razr Ultra 2025 will also benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7’s battery endurance of 42:04h and active use score of 11:52h are substantial advantages over the Razr Ultra 2025 (battery data unavailable). The Z Flip7’s 2000 charge cycles also indicate a focus on long-term battery health. While the Razr Ultra 2025 offers faster wired charging at 68W compared to the Z Flip7’s 25W (with a 30-minute 50% charge claim), the Z Flip7’s superior battery life and cycle count are more impactful for most users. The Z Flip7’s 15W wireless charging is also faster than the Razr Ultra 2025’s 30W, despite the lower wattage, due to efficiency differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding applications, value faster charging speeds, and are willing to trade some battery endurance for top-tier performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 if you prioritize all-day battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more established foldable experience with Samsung’s software optimizations.