Motorola Razr 60 vs. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2: A Deep Dive into Foldable Futures
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw power and rapid replenishment, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Razr 60’s Dimensity 7400X and 30W charging. However, the Razr 60’s impressive 45:08h endurance offers a compelling advantage for those valuing all-day battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 60 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2022, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 161.1 x 144.7 x 5.4 mm Folded: 161.1 x 73.9 x 11.2 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 262 g (9.24 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Schott UTG glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1914 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.02 inches, 206.0 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO2 OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) 6.56 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MIUI Fold 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.6, 45mm (telephoto), dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 40 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski edition | Black, Gold |
| Models | XT2553-1 | 22061218C |
| Price | € 549.90 | About 1300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1050139 (v9) GeekBench: 4368 (v5.1) GFXBench: 52fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 45:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (70 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Razr 60
- Exceptional battery endurance (45:08h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7400X)
- Slower charging speeds (30W wired, 15W wireless)
- Limited display specifications available
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Ultra-fast charging (67W wired, 40 min to 100%)
- Brighter display (1054 nits)
- Shorter battery endurance (82h)
- Potentially higher price
- Larger form factor
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1054 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Razr 60 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the Mix Fold 2’s display benefits from an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, promising deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. The Razr 60’s display specs are currently limited, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and panel technology (LTPO) impossible, but its clamshell design suggests a different form factor focus than the Mix Fold 2’s book-style fold.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited for both. The Mix Fold 2 likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, offering advanced image processing features. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Mix Fold 2’s flagship positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system overall, potentially including features like optical image stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor. We advise caution regarding any 2MP macro cameras on either device, as their utility is often limited.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Motorola Razr 60’s MediaTek Dimensity 7400X. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores, offering a significant performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Dimensity 7400X, while efficient with its 4nm process, utilizes older Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and sustained workloads, where the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s superior thermal management will prevent throttling. The Mix Fold 2’s RAM configuration (likely LPDDR5x, standard for the chipset) further contributes to its smoother multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 60 distinguishes itself with an exceptional 45:08h endurance rating, suggesting a highly optimized power consumption profile. While the Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 boasts a respectable 82h endurance, the Razr 60’s longevity is a significant advantage for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency. However, the Mix Fold 2 compensates with significantly faster charging: 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support allows for a full charge in just 40 minutes, while the Razr 60’s 30W wired and 15W wireless charging are considerably slower. The Razr 60 also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 60 if you need exceptional battery endurance and a potentially more affordable entry point into the foldable world. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and aren’t demanding the absolute highest performance. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 if you prefer a flagship-level experience with blazing-fast charging and a powerful processor, making it perfect for power users, gamers, and those who frequently multitask.