Motorola Razr 60 vs. vivo X Fold+: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Endurance

The foldable phone market is heating up, with the Motorola Razr 60 and vivo X Fold+ representing distinct approaches. The Razr 60 aims for a balance of style and affordability, while the X Fold+ targets flagship performance and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which foldable best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw power and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X Fold+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers superior performance, and 80W wired charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Motorola Razr 60 offers respectable endurance and a more accessible price point.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Razr 60 vivo X Fold+
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE-A, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1x
Launch
Announced2025, April 242022, September 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 25Available. Released 2022, September 29
Body
BuildPlastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel)-
DimensionsUnfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mmUnfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)311 g (10.97 oz)
Display
ProtectionMohs level 4-
Resolution1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density)1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density)
Size6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+
 -Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G615 MC2Adreno 730
OSAndroid 15Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF-
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin TonesZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide)
Single-16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNo-
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos)Yes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent)Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging30W wired 15W wireless80W wired, 100% in 35 min (advertised) 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 4500 mAhLi-Po 4730 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsPantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski editionBlack, Blue, Red
ModelsXT2553-1V2229A
Price€ 549.90About 1450 EUR
EU LABEL
Battery45:08h endurance, 1000 cycles-
EnergyClass A-
Free fallClass C (70 falls)-
RepairabilityClass B-

Motorola Razr 60

  • Longer battery endurance (45:08h)
  • Potentially more affordable price point
  • 1000 charge cycles promise longevity

  • Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7400X)
  • Slower charging speeds (30W wired, 15W wireless)

vivo X Fold+

  • Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
  • Ultra-fast 80W wired charging (0-100% in 35 min)
  • 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging

  • Potentially shorter battery life due to higher power consumption
  • Likely higher price tag

Display Comparison

While both devices feature foldable displays, specifics beyond resolution are missing. However, the X Fold+'s target market suggests a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The Razr 60 likely prioritizes cost optimization in its display assembly. The absence of LTPO information for either device makes it difficult to assess power efficiency gains from variable refresh rates.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the X Fold+'s positioning as a flagship suggests a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The Razr 60 likely focuses on providing a competent camera experience without pushing the boundaries of mobile photography. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures hinders a more precise assessment.

Performance

The vivo X Fold+ boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a significant step up from the Motorola Razr 60’s MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, provides a substantial performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the Razr 60’s Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 2.6 GHz. The X Fold+ also benefits from a more advanced GPU architecture, translating to superior gaming performance. While both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, Qualcomm’s architecture generally offers better sustained performance due to superior thermal management.

Battery Life

The Motorola Razr 60 claims 45:08h of endurance, suggesting a well-optimized power management system despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (unspecified). However, the vivo X Fold+’s 80W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 35 minutes (advertised), is a game-changer. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the Razr 60’s 30W wired charging. The X Fold+ also offers 50W wireless charging, further enhancing convenience, while the Razr 60 is limited to 15W wireless charging. The X Fold+'s reverse wireless charging capability is also absent on the Razr 60.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Razr 60 if you need a stylish, relatively affordable foldable with solid battery life for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. It’s ideal for users who value portability and don’t demand the absolute highest performance. Buy the vivo X Fold+ if you prefer a powerhouse foldable with blazing-fast charging, capable of handling demanding applications, extended gaming sessions, and benefit from a more premium overall experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Dimensity 7400X in the Razr 60 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 7400X is a capable mid-range chip, but it won't deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the X Fold+. While Genshin Impact will be playable on the Razr 60, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a smooth frame rate. The X Fold+ will handle the game at higher settings with less throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the X Fold+ compared to the 30W charging on the Razr 60 in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The X Fold+ advertises a full charge in 35 minutes, while the Razr 60 will take considerably longer – likely over 90 minutes. This means you can quickly top up the X Fold+ during short breaks, whereas the Razr 60 requires a more extended charging period.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the X Fold+ tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its efficiency improvements over previous generations, mitigating overheating issues. However, sustained high loads will still generate heat. The X Fold+'s thermal design will play a crucial role in managing this heat, but it's likely to experience some throttling after extended gaming, though less so than older Snapdragon chips.
❓ What is the impact of the 1000 charge cycles claim on the Razr 60's long-term battery health?
The 1000 charge cycle claim suggests Motorola has confidence in the Razr 60's battery longevity. It means the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its capacity after being fully charged and discharged 1000 times. This is a positive indicator for users who frequently charge their phones.