Motorola Razr 60 vs. vivo X Fold+: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X Fold+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers superior performance, and 80W wired charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Motorola Razr 60 offers respectable endurance and a more accessible price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 60 | vivo X Fold+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2022, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2022, September 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 80W wired, 100% in 35 min (advertised) 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4730 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski edition | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | XT2553-1 | V2229A |
| Price | € 549.90 | About 1450 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 45:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (70 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Razr 60
- Longer battery endurance (45:08h)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- 1000 charge cycles promise longevity
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7400X)
- Slower charging speeds (30W wired, 15W wireless)
vivo X Fold+
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Ultra-fast 80W wired charging (0-100% in 35 min)
- 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Potentially shorter battery life due to higher power consumption
- Likely higher price tag
Display Comparison
While both devices feature foldable displays, specifics beyond resolution are missing. However, the X Fold+'s target market suggests a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The Razr 60 likely prioritizes cost optimization in its display assembly. The absence of LTPO information for either device makes it difficult to assess power efficiency gains from variable refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the X Fold+'s positioning as a flagship suggests a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The Razr 60 likely focuses on providing a competent camera experience without pushing the boundaries of mobile photography. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures hinders a more precise assessment.
Performance
The vivo X Fold+ boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a significant step up from the Motorola Razr 60’s MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, provides a substantial performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the Razr 60’s Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 2.6 GHz. The X Fold+ also benefits from a more advanced GPU architecture, translating to superior gaming performance. While both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, Qualcomm’s architecture generally offers better sustained performance due to superior thermal management.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 60 claims 45:08h of endurance, suggesting a well-optimized power management system despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (unspecified). However, the vivo X Fold+’s 80W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 35 minutes (advertised), is a game-changer. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the Razr 60’s 30W wired charging. The X Fold+ also offers 50W wireless charging, further enhancing convenience, while the Razr 60 is limited to 15W wireless charging. The X Fold+'s reverse wireless charging capability is also absent on the Razr 60.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 60 if you need a stylish, relatively affordable foldable with solid battery life for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. It’s ideal for users who value portability and don’t demand the absolute highest performance. Buy the vivo X Fold+ if you prefer a powerhouse foldable with blazing-fast charging, capable of handling demanding applications, extended gaming sessions, and benefit from a more premium overall experience.