Motorola Razr 60 vs. Sony Xperia 5 IV: A Deep Dive into Foldable Innovation and Compact Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a unique experience and long-term battery health, the Motorola Razr 60 is the better choice. Its 45:08h endurance and 1000 cycle battery life significantly outweigh the Xperia 5 IV’s older 116h rating, despite the latter’s more powerful processor. However, power users will find the Xperia 5 IV’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 60 | Sony Xperia 5 IV |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | 156 x 67 x 8.2 mm (6.14 x 2.64 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.5", dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | Wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski edition | Green, Black, Ecru White |
| Models | XT2553-1 | XQCQ62B-GC, XQCQ62G.GC, XQ-CQ72/B2TWCX0, XQ-CQ72/C2TWCX0, XQ-CQ72/G2TWCX0, XQCQ54C0B.YD, XQCQ54C0G.YD, XQCQ54C0C.YD, XQ-CQ54, XQ-CQ72, A204SO |
| Price | € 549.90 | € 248.89 / $ 999.00 / £ 189.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 116h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 835038 (v9) GeekBench: 3448 (v5.1) GFXBench: 63fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 45:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (70 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Razr 60
- Exceptional battery endurance (45:08h)
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 cycles)
- Innovative foldable design
- Display specs are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Sony Xperia 5 IV
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor
- Bright and high-contrast display (979 nits)
- Fast wired charging (50% in 30 min)
- Lower battery endurance (116h)
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 5 IV boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 979 nits, crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Razr 60’s display specs are not provided, its foldable nature inherently introduces compromises in color accuracy and potential crease visibility. The Xperia 5 IV’s infinite contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, delivers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Razr 60’s foldable screen, while innovative, may not match the color calibration and viewing angles of the Xperia 5 IV’s more conventional display.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking for the Razr 60. The Xperia 5 IV likely benefits from Sony’s Alpha camera expertise, offering advanced features and image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Razr 60, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Xperia 5 IV’s camera system is expected to excel in video recording, leveraging Sony’s professional video features. The absence of detail regarding the Razr 60’s camera suggests it may not compete directly with the Xperia 5 IV in terms of image quality and features.
Performance
The Sony Xperia 5 IV leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores. This configuration provides substantial processing power. The Motorola Razr 60, powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4nm), utilizes a Cortex-A78 and A55 core arrangement, clocked at 2.6 GHz and 2.0 GHz respectively. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s architectural advantages, particularly the Cortex-X2, translate to superior single-core performance. However, the Dimensity 7400X’s efficiency could lead to better sustained performance under load, mitigating potential throttling issues often associated with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 60’s battery endurance of 45:08h and 1000 cycles is a standout feature, indicating exceptional longevity and resilience. The Sony Xperia 5 IV’s older 116h endurance rating, while respectable, falls significantly short. The Razr 60 supports 30W wired and 15W wireless charging, while the Xperia 5 IV offers faster wired charging with PD3.0 (50% in 30 minutes) and also supports wireless and reverse wireless charging. Despite the Xperia 5 IV’s faster charging speeds, the Razr 60’s superior endurance and cycle count provide a more compelling long-term battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 60 if you need a head-turning design, a genuinely different smartphone experience, and exceptional battery longevity with a focus on long-term usability. Buy the Sony Xperia 5 IV if you prefer a traditional flagship form factor, demand maximum processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and value a brighter, high-contrast display for multimedia consumption.