Motorola Razr 60 vs. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a unique, pocketable design and exceptional battery life, the Motorola Razr 60 emerges as the winner. While the S23 FE boasts a brighter display and potentially faster processing (depending on region), the Razr 60’s 45:08h endurance and innovative form factor offer a distinct advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2023, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | 158 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.22 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - InternationalOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - USA |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - USA |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 920 - InternationalAdreno 730 - USA |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski edition | Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine |
| Models | XT2553-1 | SM-S711B, SM-S711B/DS, SM-S711U1, SM-S711U, SM-S711W, SM-S7110, SM-S711N |
| Price | € 549.90 | $ 219.95 / C$ 327.90 / £ 248.99 / € 272.00 / ₹ 34,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.76 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 45:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (70 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Razr 60
- Exceptional battery life (45:08h endurance)
- Unique and innovative foldable design
- Potentially better thermal management due to efficient chipset
- Foldable display crease may be noticeable
- Potentially lower peak performance compared to S23 FE
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
- Brighter display (985 nits)
- Potentially faster processing (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1/Exynos 2200)
- More versatile camera system (likely)
- Significantly shorter battery life (8:28h active use)
- Exynos variant may suffer from thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE immediately distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 985 nits, making it significantly more visible in direct sunlight compared to the Razr 60 (brightness data unavailable). While the Razr 60’s foldable display is its defining feature, the S23 FE’s panel likely benefits from Samsung’s superior color calibration and potentially a higher refresh rate (assumed 120Hz based on market segment). The crease on the Razr 60, while improving with each generation, remains a consideration for users accustomed to traditional flat displays. The S23 FE’s flat display offers a more uniform viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices, making a direct comparison challenging. However, given Samsung’s history, the S23 FE likely features a more versatile camera system with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing. The Razr 60’s camera is likely optimized for social media sharing and casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential; image quality from such sensors is typically underwhelming. The S23 FE’s video capabilities are expected to be superior, benefiting from Samsung’s advanced stabilization and recording features.
Performance
The chipset choice is a critical differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE ships with either the Exynos 2200 (International) or the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (USA), both 4nm chips. The Razr 60 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4nm). While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Exynos 2200 generally outperform the Dimensity 7400X in raw CPU benchmarks (the S23 FE’s CPU features a Cortex-X2 core, absent in the Razr 60), the Dimensity 7400X is optimized for efficiency. The Razr 60’s CPU configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is geared towards sustained performance rather than peak bursts. The S23 FE’s CPU (International: 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510; USA: 1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) offers a more powerful single-core performance, beneficial for demanding applications. However, the Exynos 2200 has been known to exhibit thermal throttling under sustained load, a potential issue the Razr 60’s more efficient chipset may avoid.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 60’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 45:08 hours. This significantly surpasses the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE’s active use score of 8:28 hours. While the S23 FE offers faster wired charging at 25W (with PD3.0 and a 30-minute 50% charge claim) compared to the Razr 60’s 30W, the Razr 60’s superior battery capacity and efficiency likely offset this difference in real-world usage. Both devices support 15W wireless charging, and the S23 FE adds the convenience of reverse wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 60 if you crave a head-turning design, value long battery life above all else, and are willing to adapt to the nuances of a foldable display. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE if you prioritize a consistently powerful performance, a vibrant and bright display for outdoor use, and a more traditional smartphone experience with a well-established camera system.