Motorola Razr 60 vs. Oppo Find N2 Flip: A Deep Dive into the Foldable Future
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Oppo Find N2 Flip emerges as the stronger contender. While the Razr 60 boasts impressive battery endurance, the Find N2 Flip’s significantly more powerful Dimensity 9000+ chipset and brighter display deliver a superior overall experience, justifying its likely higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 60 | Oppo Find N2 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2022, December 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front (unfolded), plastic back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 166.2 x 75.2 x 7.5 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.2 x 16 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| - | Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5 3.26 inches, 382 x 720 pixels, 250 PPI 800 nits (HBM), 900 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, dual proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski edition | Astral Black, Moonlit Purple, Gold |
| Models | XT2553-1 | CPH2437, PGT110 |
| Price | € 549.90 | About 490 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 773574 (v9) GeekBench: 3265 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 45:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (70 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Razr 60
- Exceptional battery endurance (45:08h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7400X)
- Display brightness likely lower than Oppo
- Slower charging speeds
Oppo Find N2 Flip
- Flagship-level performance (Dimensity 9000+)
- Brighter and higher contrast display (1039 nits)
- Faster charging (44W, 50% in 23 min)
- Shorter battery endurance (97h)
- Potentially higher price
- Battery lifespan not explicitly stated
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N2 Flip immediately distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1039 nits, offering a significantly more visible experience outdoors compared to the Razr 60 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the Find N2 Flip’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of PWM frequency data for the Razr 60 raises potential concerns for users sensitive to flicker, a detail Oppo doesn’t disclose but is crucial for comfortable prolonged use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Find N2 Flip’s flagship positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system with potentially better image processing and low-light performance. The Razr 60 likely focuses on providing adequate image quality for social media sharing, while the Find N2 Flip aims for a more premium photographic experience. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device is a notable omission.
Performance
The chipset disparity is substantial. The Oppo Find N2 Flip’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) is a clear upgrade over the Motorola Razr 60’s Dimensity 7400X (4nm). The 9000+ features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.20 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores, providing a significant boost in CPU and GPU performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the architectural differences favor the Oppo in demanding scenarios. The Razr 60’s Cortex-A78 cores, while efficient, simply can’t match the raw power of the 9000+’s configuration.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 60 shines in battery endurance, boasting a remarkable 45:08h rating and a claimed 1000 charge cycles. This suggests exceptional longevity and all-day usability for most users. The Oppo Find N2 Flip, with a 97h endurance rating, still offers respectable battery life, but falls short of the Razr 60. However, the Find N2 Flip compensates with significantly faster charging – 44W wired, achieving 50% charge in just 23 minutes, compared to the Razr 60’s 30W wired and 15W wireless. The Find N2 Flip also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Razr 60, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 60 if you prioritize exceptional battery life and value for money, and are willing to trade some processing power for it. It’s ideal for users who primarily use their phones for communication, social media, and light tasks. Buy the Oppo Find N2 Flip if you demand flagship-level performance, a vibrant and bright display for media consumption, and faster charging speeds, even if it means slightly less battery endurance.