Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a more conventional experience, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers excellent efficiency and a mature software experience. However, the Razr 60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite and foldable form factor are compelling for early adopters seeking innovation.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Ceramic), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.5 x 74 x 7.2 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.7 mm | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2912 pixels (~464 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 106.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.6µm, PDAF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, Dolby Vision HDR, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | XT2551-6 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | € 725.00 / $ 849.99 / £ 763.91 / ₹ 89,998 | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:48h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (50 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Cutting-edge foldable design
- Snapdragon 8 Elite offers potential performance lead
- Longer battery life in active use
- 1000 charge cycle battery
- Foldable screen durability concerns
- Software optimization may be less mature
- Slower wired charging
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Excellent camera system with established image processing
- Robust and durable build quality
- Shorter active use battery life
- Lower peak display brightness
- Conventional design lacks innovation
Display Comparison
The Razr 60 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1489 nits, exceeding the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 1253 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both offer excellent displays, the Razr’s foldable nature is the key differentiator. The Xiaomi 13 Pro, however, benefits from an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, providing deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Razr’s foldable screen introduces potential durability concerns, a factor the Xiaomi 13 Pro avoids with its robust glass construction. The impact of the fold on viewing angles and potential crease visibility should be considered.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro is likely to have a more refined and consistent experience due to its established image processing pipeline. While both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s camera system is known for its excellent dynamic range and color accuracy. The Razr 60 Ultra’s camera performance will depend heavily on software optimization, given the novelty of its form factor. Sensor sizes and lens apertures are not specified, making a direct comparison difficult, but Xiaomi’s history suggests a focus on larger sensors for improved low-light performance.
Performance
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) represents a significant architectural shift with its Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This contrasts with the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), utilizing Cortex-X3 and Cortex-A715/A710 cores at 3.2 GHz. The 3nm process of the 8 Elite should deliver superior power efficiency and thermal performance, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. While the Gen 2 is a proven performer, the 8 Elite’s new architecture promises a performance edge, particularly in tasks optimized for its core configuration. The Razr 60 Ultra’s LPDDR5x RAM configuration is assumed to be similar to the Xiaomi 13 Pro, ensuring ample memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging (100% in 19 minutes) is significantly faster than the Razr 60 Ultra’s 68W wired charging. The Xiaomi also offers 50W wireless charging (100% in 36 minutes) compared to the Razr’s 30W. Despite the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s endurance rating of 115h versus the Razr 60 Ultra’s 48:48h endurance, the active use score tells a different story: 15:10h for the Razr versus 10:55h for the Xiaomi. This suggests the Razr 60 Ultra’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software contribute to longer real-world usage despite a potentially smaller battery capacity. The Razr 60 Ultra also boasts 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra if you need a truly innovative, foldable experience and are willing to accept potential software quirks for cutting-edge technology. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite promises top-tier performance in a unique package. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prefer a polished, reliable flagship with a stunning display, exceptional camera capabilities, and incredibly fast charging – a proven performer for demanding users.