Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra arrives as a bold contender, challenging Samsung’s dominance with its new Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and innovative foldable design. This comparison pits the Razr 60 Ultra’s bleeding-edge technology against the refined and feature-rich Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, examining which device delivers the best overall experience for demanding users.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience and established ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra remains the safer bet. However, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite offers a potential performance edge, particularly for gamers and power users willing to embrace a foldable form factor.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA
Launch
Announced2025, April 242023, February 01
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 25Available. Released 2023, February 17
Body
BuildPlastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Ceramic), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel)Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 171.5 x 74 x 7.2 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.7 mm163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Weight199 g (7.02 oz)234 g (8.25 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro)
Display
ProtectionMohs level 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1224 x 2912 pixels (~464 ppi density)1440 x 3088 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~500 ppi density)
Size7.0 inches, 106.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak)Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak)
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 740
OSAndroid 15Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 4.0
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.6µm, PDAF-
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin TonesLaser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama
Quad-200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 10 MP, f/4.9, 230mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video
Single-12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, Dolby Vision HDR, gyro-EIS8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, HDR10+
Single50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos)Yes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent)Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 -Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Charging68W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wired45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless
Type4700 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretPhantom Black, Green, Cream, Lavender, Graphite, Sky Blue, Lime, Red, BMW M Edition
ModelsXT2551-6SM-S918B, SM-S918B/DS, SM-S918U, SM-S918U1, SM-S918W, SM-S918N, SM-S9180, SM-S918E, SM-S918E/DS
Price€ 725.00 / $ 849.99 / £ 763.91 / ₹ 89,998€ 549.90 / $ 454.99 / £ 433.00
SAR-1.12 W/kg (head)     0.92 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.96 W/kg (head)     1.40 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 126h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 1241531 (v9) GeekBench: 4927 (v5.1) GFXBench: 67fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)
EU LABEL
Battery48:48h endurance, 1000 cycles-
EnergyClass A-
Free fallClass D (50 falls)-
RepairabilityClass B-

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • Potentially faster processor with Snapdragon 8 Elite
  • Faster wired and wireless charging speeds
  • Innovative foldable design

  • Foldable screen crease
  • Limited camera details in provided data
  • Newer technology with potential software quirks

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • Mature software experience and ecosystem
  • Versatile and well-regarded camera system
  • Excellent battery life and efficient power management

  • Slower charging speeds compared to Razr 60 Ultra
  • Older generation chipset
  • Higher price point

Display Comparison

The Razr 60 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1489 nits, exceeding the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 1274 nits, promising superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays offer excellent quality, the Razr’s foldable nature introduces a crease, a trade-off for the innovative form factor. The S23 Ultra’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels, delivers deep blacks, but the Razr’s higher peak brightness provides a noticeable advantage in HDR content. The absence of PWM frequency data for the Razr necessitates caution for users sensitive to flicker, while the S23 Ultra’s well-established panel technology offers a consistent viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

While both devices feature capable camera systems, the context data for the Razr 60 Ultra lacks specific details beyond 'Photo / Video'. The Galaxy S23 Ultra is renowned for its versatile camera array, including a high-resolution main sensor and advanced image processing. The S23 Ultra’s superior optical image stabilization (OIS) and refined software algorithms likely provide better low-light performance and video stabilization. Without detailed specifications for the Razr’s camera, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities beyond assuming a competitive offering within the flagship segment. The S23 Ultra’s established camera reputation and feature set give it a clear advantage based on available information.

Performance

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in efficiency and performance compared to the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Razr’s octa-core CPU, featuring Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz, is architecturally distinct from the S23 Ultra’s Cortex-X3 setup. This translates to potentially faster single-core performance on the Razr, beneficial for responsive UI and app loading. However, the S23 Ultra’s optimized software and thermal management could mitigate the raw performance advantage of the Razr, especially during sustained workloads. The Razr 60 Ultra’s 3nm node should also result in better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.

Battery Life

The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s endurance rating of 126 hours suggests a longer overall battery life compared to the Razr 60 Ultra’s 48:48h endurance. However, the Razr 60 Ultra’s active use score of 15:10h surpasses the S23 Ultra’s 13:24h, indicating potentially better performance under heavy load. The Razr’s 68W wired charging significantly outpaces the S23 Ultra’s 45W charging, promising faster top-ups. The Razr also offers 30W wireless charging, exceeding the S23 Ultra’s 15W wireless charging. While the S23 Ultra’s larger battery capacity provides a buffer, the Razr’s faster charging speeds and potentially more efficient chipset could offset this difference for many users.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra if you prioritize cutting-edge processor performance, a unique foldable design, and are comfortable with the potential trade-offs of a newer technology. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra if you value a mature software experience, a versatile camera system, and long-term reliability within the Samsung ecosystem.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Razr 60 Ultra actually translate to a noticeable gaming advantage over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the S23 Ultra?
The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process and Oryon V2 cores offer a theoretical performance advantage, particularly in sustained gaming scenarios. However, the S23 Ultra’s optimized thermal management and software could close the gap. Real-world performance will depend on game optimization and the duration of gameplay. Expect the Razr to potentially excel in short bursts, while the S23 Ultra may maintain more consistent performance over longer sessions.
❓ How does the foldable design of the Razr 60 Ultra impact its durability compared to the traditional form factor of the S23 Ultra?
Foldable phones inherently introduce more potential points of failure due to the moving hinge and flexible display. Motorola claims the Razr 60 Ultra’s hinge is rated for 1000 cycles, but long-term durability remains a concern. The S23 Ultra’s robust construction and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection offer greater resistance to drops and scratches. While Motorola has made strides in improving foldable durability, the S23 Ultra is likely the more resilient device.
❓ What are the implications of the Razr 60 Ultra's 68W charging speed for daily use?
The Razr 60 Ultra’s 68W charging allows for significantly faster top-ups compared to the S23 Ultra’s 45W charging. This means less downtime plugged into the wall, especially beneficial for users who frequently run low on battery. While a full charge time isn't specified, expect a substantial reduction in charging time compared to the S23 Ultra.