Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs. Oppo Find N3 Flip: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, built on a 3nm process, delivers a noticeable advantage over the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s Dimensity 9200, despite the Oppo’s respectable endurance rating. However, the Find N3 Flip remains a strong contender for those valuing camera capabilities and a slightly more compact form factor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Oppo Find N3 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Ceramic), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.5 x 74 x 7.2 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.7 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2912 pixels (~464 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 106.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.6µm, PDAF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, Dolby Vision HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 30W wireless 5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | XT2551-6 | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | € 725.00 / $ 849.99 / £ 763.91 / ₹ 89,998 | About 1200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:48h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (50 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Superior chipset performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster charging speeds (68W wired, 30W wireless)
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Potential for higher price point
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- Potentially better camera system (based on marketing)
- Slightly longer battery endurance rating
- More compact form factor (likely)
- Refined foldable software experience
- Slower charging speeds (44W wired)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 9200)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1489 nits compared to the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s 939 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the Razr’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of refresh rate data for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but both are expected to offer smooth scrolling experiences. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, but a side-by-side comparison would be needed for a definitive assessment.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Oppo Find N3 Flip explicitly mentions 'Photo / Video' capabilities, suggesting a stronger emphasis on camera features. However, without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. The Razr 60 Ultra’s camera specs are absent, making a detailed analysis impossible. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera systems, but the Oppo’s marketing suggests a more robust camera experience. The absence of information regarding OIS or lens apertures hinders a deeper assessment. It's likely the Oppo will offer more versatile zoom capabilities.
Performance
The core differentiator lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) is a powerhouse, featuring an octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture, coupled with the smaller 3nm node, promises superior performance and thermal efficiency compared to the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s 4nm MediaTek Dimensity 9200. The Dimensity 9200, while still a capable chip, utilizes a more traditional core arrangement (1x Cortex-X3, 3x Cortex-A715, 4x Cortex-A510). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon cores are designed for sustained peak performance, crucial for demanding games and applications. The Razr 60 Ultra is expected to exhibit less throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra claims an impressive 48:48h endurance rating and supports 68W wired charging, 30W wireless, and 5W reverse wired charging. The Oppo Find N3 Flip, with an older 92h endurance rating, and 44W wired charging (50% in 23 minutes) lags behind in charging speed. While the Oppo’s endurance rating appears higher, the Razr 60 Ultra’s active use score of 15:10h surpasses the Oppo’s 12:58h, indicating better real-world performance under load. The Razr’s 1000 cycle battery longevity is also a significant advantage, suggesting a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the efficiency of the latest Snapdragon architecture. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prioritize camera versatility, a potentially longer battery life in moderate use, and prefer a slightly more refined software experience focused on foldable-specific features.