Motorola Razr 50 vs. Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Foldable Innovation and Flagship Power

The Motorola Razr 50 represents a compelling evolution in foldable technology, aiming to deliver a refined and accessible folding experience. Conversely, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a traditional flagship, prioritizing raw performance and cutting-edge charging technology. This comparison dissects these two approaches, revealing which device best suits your needs and priorities.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and blazing-fast charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Razr 50, despite the Razr's innovative foldable form factor. However, the Razr 50 is the clear choice for those captivated by the foldable experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Razr 50 Xiaomi 14T Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, June 252024, September 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, June 25Available. Released 2024, September 26
Body
BuildPlastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel)Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X)
DimensionsUnfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm Folded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight188.4 g (6.63 oz)209 g (7.37 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density)1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density)
Size6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)
GPUMali-G615 MC2Immortalis-G720 MC12
OSAndroid 14Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF-
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLeica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple-50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent)Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging30W wired 15W wireless120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min
Type4200 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsKoala Grey (Steel Wool), Beach Sand (Pumice Stone), Spritz Orange (Arabesque)Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black
ModelsXT2453-12407FPN8EG
Price€ 479.00 / £ 541.99 / ₹ 40,488$ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99
SAR EU-0.99 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)

Motorola Razr 50

  • Innovative foldable design offers unique portability.
  • High peak display brightness (1289 nits).
  • Compact form factor when folded.

  • Slower charging speeds (30W wired, 15W wireless).
  • Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7300X) compared to the competition.
  • Potentially lower battery life (11:46h active use).

Xiaomi 14T Pro

  • Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in 19 minutes).
  • Powerful Dimensity 9300+ chipset for demanding tasks.
  • Longer battery life (12:32h active use).

  • Traditional flagship design lacks the novelty of a foldable.
  • May be larger and less pocketable than the Razr 50.
  • No foldable display.

Display Comparison

Both the Razr 50 and Xiaomi 14T Pro boast impressive displays, achieving peak brightness levels of 1289 nits and 1228 nits respectively. While the difference is minimal, the Razr 50’s foldable nature is its defining characteristic. The 14T Pro likely benefits from a more traditional, optimized panel structure, potentially offering slightly better color accuracy. The Razr 50’s folding display, while visually striking, introduces inherent complexities in manufacturing that can impact long-term durability and crease visibility – factors not directly quantifiable from these specs.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the 14T Pro will have a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Dimensity 9300+’s superior processing capabilities will likely translate to more sophisticated computational photography features. While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the 14T Pro’s processing power will be crucial for maximizing image quality and detail.

Performance

The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ chipset represents a significant leap in performance over the Razr 50’s Dimensity 7300X. The 9300+ features a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core alongside 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores, a configuration designed for sustained peak performance. The Razr 50’s 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, while capable, are architecturally older and less efficient. This translates to a noticeable advantage for the 14T Pro in demanding applications like gaming and video editing. The 4nm fabrication process is shared between both chipsets, but the architectural differences within the 9300+ provide a clear performance edge.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 12:32h active use score surpasses the Razr 50’s 11:46h, indicating superior battery endurance. This advantage is further amplified by the 14T Pro’s revolutionary 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Razr 50’s 30W wired and 15W wireless charging are comparatively slow. The 14T Pro’s charging speed is a game-changer for users who prioritize minimizing downtime, while the Razr 50 requires significantly longer to replenish its battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Razr 50 if you prioritize portability, a unique user experience, and are willing to trade some battery life and raw processing power for the convenience of a foldable display. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming and demanding tasks, require exceptionally fast charging, and value longer battery endurance for all-day use.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How does the folding mechanism of the Razr 50 impact its long-term durability compared to the 14T Pro?
The Razr 50’s folding display introduces potential points of failure not present in the 14T Pro’s traditional design. While Motorola has made strides in improving hinge durability and screen protection, the crease and the repeated folding motion remain potential long-term concerns. The 14T Pro, with its rigid construction, is inherently more resistant to physical stress.
❓ Is the Dimensity 7300X in the Razr 50 sufficient for playing graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Dimensity 7300X is a capable chipset, but it won’t deliver the same level of sustained performance as the Dimensity 9300+ in the 14T Pro. You can play demanding games on the Razr 50, but you may need to lower graphics settings to maintain a smooth frame rate and avoid overheating during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Xiaomi 14T Pro's 120W charging generate excessive heat during the charging process?
Xiaomi has implemented sophisticated thermal management systems to mitigate heat generation during 120W charging. While the phone will warm up during charging, it's designed to prevent overheating and maintain battery health. The charging process is optimized to deliver power efficiently and safely.