Motorola Razr 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and modern chipset efficiency, the Motorola Razr 50 emerges as the winner. Its 11:46h active use score significantly surpasses what’s expected from the Z Flip 5G, and the Dimensity 7300X offers a more efficient architecture. However, the Z Flip 5G remains a viable option for those deeply embedded in the Samsung ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, Canada |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 Sub6 - China, Hong Kong |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 41, 66, 71 Sub6 - Canada | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 25 | 2020, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 25 | Available. Released 2020, August 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm Folded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 167.3 x 73.6 x 7.2 mm Folded: 87.4 x 73.6 x 17.3 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2636 pixels (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| - | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.1 inches, 112 x 300 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.09 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 15W wired 9W wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 3300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Koala Grey (Steel Wool), Beach Sand (Pumice Stone), Spritz Orange (Arabesque) | Mystic Grey, Mystic Bronze, Mystic White |
| Models | XT2453-1 | SM-F707B, SM-F707N, SM-F7070, SM-F707U, SM-F707U1, SM-F707W |
| Price | € 479.00 / £ 541.99 / ₹ 40,488 | About 800 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.01 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Razr 50
- Superior battery life (11:46h active use)
- More efficient and modern chipset (Dimensity 7300X)
- Faster wired charging (30W)
- Motorola’s software support is historically shorter than Samsung’s
- Brand recognition isn't as strong as Samsung
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G
- Established foldable design and build quality
- Strong integration within the Samsung ecosystem
- Potentially wider range of software features
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Older and less efficient chipset (Snapdragon 865)
- Slower charging speeds (15W wired)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Razr 50 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1289 nits, a significant advantage over the Z Flip 5G (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower for older foldables). This translates to better outdoor visibility. While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the Razr 50’s higher brightness and potentially newer panel technology (though specifics are missing) likely offer a more vibrant and readable experience. The Z Flip 5G’s display, while good, is showing its age in comparison, and may suffer from lower contrast and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, given the Razr 50 is a newer device, it likely benefits from improved image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor. The Z Flip 5G’s camera, while capable, is likely to exhibit more noise and less dynamic range in challenging lighting conditions. We advise ignoring the typical 2MP macro lenses found on both devices, as their image quality is generally poor.
Performance
The chipset is where a clear divergence emerges. The Motorola Razr 50’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4nm) is architecturally superior to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7nm+). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300X delivers improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning less throttling during demanding tasks. While the Snapdragon 865’s CPU clock speeds (1x3.09 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A77, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) appear higher on paper than the Razr 50’s (Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)), the newer architecture and process node of the Dimensity 7300X provide a more balanced and sustained performance profile. The Z Flip 5G’s older chipset will struggle more with modern, resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 50’s 11:46h active use battery score is a standout feature. This significantly outperforms expectations for a foldable device and suggests excellent power efficiency. The Z Flip 5G’s battery life is expected to be considerably lower, given its older chipset and larger process node. While the Z Flip 5G supports 15W wired and 9W wireless charging, the Razr 50’s 30W wired charging offers a faster top-up time. The combination of a more efficient chipset and faster charging gives the Razr 50 a clear advantage in the battery department.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 50 if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use, a more modern and efficient processor for sustained performance, and value a competitive price. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G if you prioritize brand recognition, a potentially wider range of software features within the Samsung ecosystem, and are willing to trade battery life for a more established foldable design.