Motorola Razr 2025 vs. Xiaomi Mix Fold 4: A Deep Dive into Foldable Power and Efficiency
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a more manageable price point, the Motorola Razr 2025 is the stronger choice. However, power users demanding the absolute fastest performance and fastest charging will find the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2025 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2024, July 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Available. Released 2024, July 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 159.4 x 143.3 x 4.6 mm Folded: 159.4 x 73.1 x 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 226 g or 228 g (7.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 2224 x 2488 pixels (~418 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.98 inches, 204.1 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1700 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF (9cm - ∞), OIS, 2x optical zoom 10 MP, f/2.9, 115mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dolby Vision HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 16 MP, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band (tri-band after future SW update), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (NA only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 31% in 10 min 50W wireless, 24% in 10 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink | Black, White, Blue |
| Price | $ 599.99 | About 1140 EUR |
Motorola Razr 2025
- Exceptional battery life (9:28h active use)
- Bright display (1189 nits)
- More efficient chipset for longer runtimes
- Less powerful processor than the competition
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Ultra-fast 67W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- Potentially shorter battery life due to power-hungry chipset
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Razr 2025 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1189 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Mix Fold 4’s display specs are currently unavailable, Xiaomi typically employs high-quality panels. The Razr’s focus on brightness suggests a strong outdoor viewing experience. The absence of LTPO information for either device means we can’t assess adaptive refresh rate efficiency, but the Razr’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability. The foldable form factor inherently introduces a crease; the quality of hinge design and panel construction will be critical, but data is unavailable to compare.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the Mix Fold 4 is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The Dimensity 7400X’s ISP is capable, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP offers more headroom for computational photography. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures prevents a deeper analysis, but the Mix Fold 4’s chipset suggests a potential edge in image quality and low-light performance.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant leap in performance over the Motorola Razr 2025’s MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, offers substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Dimensity 7400X, while efficient, utilizes older Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to a noticeable advantage for the Mix Fold 4 in graphically intensive tasks and multitasking. The Mix Fold 4’s superior chipset will also benefit from Qualcomm’s advanced AI engine.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 2025 achieves an impressive 9:28h of active use, indicating excellent battery optimization. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 4’s battery capacity is unknown, but its more powerful chipset will likely consume more energy. The Mix Fold 4 compensates with significantly faster charging: 67W wired (reaching 31% in 10 minutes) and 50W wireless (24% in 10 minutes) compared to the Razr 2025’s 30W wired and 15W wireless. While the Razr prioritizes longevity, the Mix Fold 4 offers the convenience of rapid top-ups. The faster charging speeds of the Mix Fold 4 are a significant advantage for users who frequently need to recharge quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 2025 if you need a foldable that can comfortably last a full day of active use, and value a more compact and pocketable design. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and require the fastest possible charging speeds – even if it impacts battery longevity.