Motorola Razr 2025 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2: Which Flip Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly longer 11:37h active use battery life and blazing-fast 70W charging outweigh the Razr 2025’s slightly brighter display. The Dimensity 8020 provides a solid performance foundation, making it a more practical daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2025 | Tecno Phantom V Flip2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2024, September 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Available. Released 2024, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 170.8 x 73.4 x 7.6 mmFolded: 87.8 x 73.4 x 16 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, HIOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (NA only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 70W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh | 4720 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Price | $ 599.99 | - |
Motorola Razr 2025
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Compact and stylish design
- Potentially better thermal efficiency due to 4nm chip
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Slower charging speeds
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Phantom V Flip2
Tecno Phantom V Flip2
- Significantly longer battery life
- Ultra-fast 70W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset
- Dimmer display compared to the Razr 2025
- Potentially less efficient chipset (6nm vs 4nm)
- Larger size/weight (potentially)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Razr 2025 boasts a brighter display, peaking at 1189 nits, which will be advantageous in direct sunlight. However, the Tecno Phantom V Flip2’s 893 nits, while lower, is still perfectly usable indoors. Both utilize foldable OLED technology, but the Razr’s higher peak brightness is the key differentiator. We’d need panel specifications (PWM frequency, color gamut coverage) to assess image quality beyond brightness, but the Razr’s advantage is clear for outdoor use cases.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the focus should be on the main sensor and image processing. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera systems, but the quality will hinge on sensor size, aperture, and software optimization. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is crucial for low-light performance. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses, the primary camera’s capabilities will define the overall photographic experience.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek’s Dimensity series, but the Tecno Phantom V Flip2’s Dimensity 8020 (6nm) has a slight edge over the Razr 2025’s Dimensity 7400X (4nm). While both CPUs share the same core configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), the 6nm process of the 8020 generally translates to slightly higher sustained performance and potentially more efficient power consumption. The 4nm node of the 7400X *should* offer better efficiency, but the 8020’s overall architecture appears to be more robust. RAM specifications are missing, but LPDDR5X would be expected in this class.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Flip2 delivers a significant advantage in battery life, achieving 11:37h of active use compared to the Razr 2025’s 9:28h. This nearly two-hour difference is substantial for a device category already constrained by form factor. Furthermore, the Phantom V Flip2’s 70W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 45 minutes, is dramatically faster than the Razr 2025’s 30W wired and 15W wireless charging. This charging speed difference alone makes the Phantom V Flip2 a more convenient option for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 2025 if you prioritize a brighter external display for outdoor visibility and are willing to trade some battery life for it. Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 if you value all-day battery performance, incredibly fast charging, and a more efficient chipset for sustained tasks. The Phantom V Flip2 is ideal for power users and those who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day.