Motorola Razr 2025 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: A Deep Dive into the Latest Foldable Phones

The foldable phone market is heating up, with Motorola and Samsung leading the charge. The Motorola Razr 2025 aims to disrupt with a potentially aggressive price point, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 refines the established formula with a focus on performance and longevity. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right foldable for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and robust performance, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is the clear winner. Its Exynos 2500 chipset and exceptional 42:04h endurance outweigh the Razr 2025’s more affordable positioning. However, the Razr 2025 presents a strong value proposition for budget-conscious buyers.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Razr 2025 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, April 242025, July 09
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, May 15Available. Released 2025, July 25
Body
BuildPlastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel)Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mmUnfolded: 166.7 x 75.2 x 6.5 mmFolded: 85.5 x 75.2 x 13.7 mm
SIMNano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + multiple eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)188 g (6.63 oz)
Display
Protection-Mohs level 1
Resolution1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density)1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~397 ppi density)
Size6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.9 inches, 111.2 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)10-core (1x3.3GHz Cortex-X5 & 2x2.74GHz Cortex-A725 & 5x2.36GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x1.8GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm)Exynos 2500 (3 nm)
GPUMali-G615 MC2Xclipse 950
OSAndroid 15Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDR, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin TonesLED flash, HDR, panorama
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/120/240fps, HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm10 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos)Yes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.4, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent)Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (NA only)Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging30W wired 15W wireless25W wired, QC2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 4500 mAh4300 mAh
Misc
ColorsPantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait PinkBlue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint
Models-SM-F766B, SM-F766B/DS, SM-F766U, SM-F766U1
Price$ 599.99$ 799.99 / C$ 1,100.00 / £ 849.00 / € 759.00 / ₹ 109,999
SAR-0.86 W/kg (head)     1.14 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.69 W/kg (head)     1.22 W/kg (body)
EU LABEL
Battery-42:04h endurance, 2000 cycles
Energy-Class B
Free fall-Class A (210 falls)
Repairability-Class C

Motorola Razr 2025

  • Potentially more affordable price point
  • Compact and stylish design
  • 30W wired charging is relatively fast

  • Significantly weaker processor
  • Substantially shorter battery life
  • Likely inferior camera performance

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • Exceptional battery life and endurance
  • Powerful Exynos 2500 processor
  • Brighter and potentially more accurate display

  • Higher price tag
  • May be slightly bulkier than the Razr 2025
  • 25W charging isn't the fastest available

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1471 nits compared to the Razr 2025’s 1189 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both utilize foldable OLED technology, Samsung’s higher peak brightness and likely superior color calibration (based on brand history) provide a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The Z Flip7 is also expected to feature LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, potentially improving battery efficiency, a feature not explicitly mentioned for the Razr 2025.

Camera Comparison

Context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given Samsung’s history, the Z Flip7 is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The Razr 2025, positioned as a value-oriented device, may prioritize affordability over camera quality. Without specific sensor details, it’s reasonable to assume the Z Flip7 will deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence or absence of OIS on the main sensor will be a key differentiator.

Performance

The performance gap is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7’s Exynos 2500, built on a 3nm process, features a 10-core architecture with a Cortex-X5 prime core clocked at 3.3GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Motorola Razr 2025’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4nm) and its octa-core configuration. The Exynos 2500’s more advanced architecture and smaller node size promise significantly faster processing speeds and improved power efficiency, crucial for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Z Flip7’s CPU configuration, with multiple Cortex-A725 cores, suggests a focus on sustained performance, while the Razr 2025 relies on older Cortex-A78 cores.

Battery Life

Battery life is where the Z Flip7 truly shines. Its impressive 42:04h endurance and 2000 charge cycles demonstrate a commitment to longevity. The active use score of 11:52h significantly surpasses the Razr 2025’s 9:28h. While the Razr 2025 offers both wired (30W) and wireless (15W) charging, the Z Flip7’s 25W wired charging with QC2.0 and 50% charge in 30 minutes provides a faster top-up. The Z Flip7 also includes 4.5W reverse wireless charging, a convenient feature for charging accessories.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Razr 2025 if you need a stylish foldable experience on a tighter budget and prioritize a more compact form factor. You’ll accept compromises in processing power and battery life for a lower entry price. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 if you prefer a flagship-level experience with a powerful processor, exceptional battery endurance, and a more refined software experience, even if it comes at a premium.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 2500 in the Z Flip7 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 2500 is a powerful chip, Samsung has a strong track record of thermal management. The 3nm process and optimized cooling solutions should mitigate overheating, even during demanding games. However, sustained peak performance may still result in some throttling after extended periods.
❓ How does the battery health of the Z Flip7 hold up over time, given its 2000 charge cycle claim?
Samsung’s claim of 2000 charge cycles suggests a high level of battery health retention. This means the battery should maintain at least 80% of its original capacity after undergoing 2000 full charge cycles, offering excellent long-term reliability.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Razr 2025 sufficient for quick top-ups throughout the day?
30W charging is reasonably fast, but it’s slower than the Z Flip7’s 25W charging with QC2.0, which can reach 50% in 30 minutes. The Razr 2025 will take longer to fully charge, and the smaller battery capacity means you’ll be charging it more frequently.
❓ What kind of real-world performance difference can I expect between the Dimensity 7400X and the Exynos 2500 in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and email, the difference will be minimal. However, the Exynos 2500 will excel in demanding applications like video editing, gaming, and multitasking, offering a smoother and more responsive experience.