Motorola Razr 2024 vs. Tecno Phantom V Fold 2: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and all-day battery life, the Tecno Phantom V Fold 2 is the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 9000+ chipset and impressive 9:34 active use battery score outweigh the Razr 2024’s more compact form factor and slightly lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2024 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, , 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 25 | 2024, September 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 17 | Available. Released 2024, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm Folded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 159 x 140.4 x 6.1 mmFolded: 159 x 72.2 x 11.8-12 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 249 g (8.78 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 2000 x 2296 pixels (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 196.9 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HiOS 14 Fold |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 70W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 49 min 15W wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | 5750 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Koala Grey, Beach Sand, Spritz Orange | Karst Green, Rippling Blue |
| Models | - | AE10 |
| Price | $ 324.90 | ₹ 69,999 |
Motorola Razr 2024
- More compact and pocketable design.
- Potentially lower price point.
- Refined, user-friendly software experience (expected).
- Less powerful processor.
- Slower charging speeds.
- Likely shorter battery life.
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 9000+.
- Significantly faster 70W wired charging.
- Longer battery life (9:34h active use).
- Larger and less pocketable form factor.
- Potentially higher price.
- Software experience may be less polished.
Display Comparison
The Tecno Phantom V Fold 2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 573 nits, suggesting a more visible display in outdoor conditions compared to the Razr 2024 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize foldable OLED technology, the Phantom V Fold 2’s larger screen real estate and higher brightness provide a more immersive viewing experience. The Razr 2024 likely focuses on maximizing screen-to-body ratio within its smaller footprint, potentially sacrificing peak brightness. We expect both to feature similar color accuracy profiles geared towards vibrant, consumer-friendly visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Razr 2024, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Phantom V Fold 2’s camera system likely benefits from the Dimensity 9000+’s superior image signal processor (ISP). The ISP’s capabilities are crucial for noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. We anticipate the Phantom V Fold 2 to excel in low-light photography and video recording. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Phantom V Fold 2 (assumed based on Tecno’s flagship positioning) further enhances image clarity and stability, a feature likely absent or less sophisticated on the Razr 2024.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Phantom V Fold 2’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) features a powerful Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.20 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This configuration delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance than the Motorola Razr 2024’s Dimensity 7300X (4nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The Dimensity 9000+’s superior architecture translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more capable gaming experience. While both are built on a 4nm process, the architectural advantages of the 9000+ are substantial. The Razr 2024 will be sufficient for everyday tasks, but the Phantom V Fold 2 offers headroom for power users.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Fold 2 clearly wins in battery and charging. Its active use score of 9:34 hours demonstrates excellent endurance, likely due to a larger battery capacity (spec not provided) and efficient power management. The 70W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 50% charge in just 20 minutes and a full charge in 49 minutes. In contrast, the Motorola Razr 2024’s 30W wired charging is considerably slower. While both support 15W wireless charging, the Phantom V Fold 2’s faster wired charging mitigates the slower wireless speeds, offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 2024 if you prioritize pocketability and a more manageable size for one-handed use, accepting a trade-off in processing power. Buy the Tecno Phantom V Fold 2 if you demand flagship-level performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value a longer-lasting battery with significantly faster charging capabilities.