Motorola Razr 2024 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a more refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G remains a strong contender. However, the Motorola Razr 2024 offers a compelling value proposition with its newer chipset and faster charging, making it ideal for those seeking a balance of features and affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, Canada |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, , 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 Sub6 - China, Hong Kong |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 41, 66, 71 Sub6 - Canada | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 25 | 2020, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 17 | Available. Released 2020, August 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm Folded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 167.3 x 73.6 x 7.2 mm Folded: 87.4 x 73.6 x 17.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2636 pixels (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| - | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.1 inches, 112 x 300 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.09 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 15W wired 9W wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 3300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Koala Grey, Beach Sand, Spritz Orange | Mystic Grey, Mystic Bronze, Mystic White |
| Models | - | SM-F707B, SM-F707N, SM-F7070, SM-F707U, SM-F707U1, SM-F707W |
| Price | $ 324.90 | About 800 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.01 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Razr 2024
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300X chipset
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Potentially better value for money
- Software experience may not be as refined as Samsung
- Camera performance is an unknown quantity
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G
- Proven Snapdragon 865 performance
- Mature software ecosystem and updates
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Older 7nm+ chipset is less power efficient
Display Comparison
Both devices feature foldable AMOLED displays, but specifics are limited in the provided data. The Z Flip 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering superior color accuracy and brightness. The Razr 2024’s display quality will be a key factor in its overall appeal, and independent testing will be needed to assess its performance against the Z Flip 5G. The Z Flip 5G's cover screen is significantly larger and more functional, offering more utility without unfolding the device.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Z Flip 5G likely has a more refined camera system with better image processing. Motorola has been improving its camera software, but Samsung’s experience in mobile photography is a significant advantage. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS on the Razr 2024 makes it hard to assess its low-light performance. We can assume both phones will have capable main cameras, but the Z Flip 5G likely has a more consistent and polished camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Razr 2024’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4nm) represents a more recent fabrication process than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7nm+). This 4nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management. While the Snapdragon 865 boasts a higher peak CPU clock speed (3.09 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), the Dimensity 7300X’s newer architecture (Cortex-A78 cores) and process node may provide comparable, or even superior, real-world performance, especially in sustained workloads. The Z Flip 5G's older chipset may show its age in demanding games and multitasking scenarios.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr 2024’s 30W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Z Flip 5G’s 15W wired charging. This faster charging will significantly reduce the time spent tethered to an outlet. While the Z Flip 5G offers 9W wireless charging, the Razr 2024 steps it up to 15W. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns and optimization, but the Dimensity 7300X’s efficiency could offset any potential capacity differences (not specified in the data).
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 2024 if you need a more modern chipset for sustained performance and appreciate faster charging speeds, even if it means sacrificing some software polish. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G if you prefer a more established foldable experience with a proven track record, a potentially lower price point, and a more mature software ecosystem, understanding that its chipset is older generation.