Motorola Razr 2024 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE emerges as the stronger choice. Its Exynos 2400e chipset and impressive 42-hour endurance provide a more reliable experience, while the Razr 2024 excels in novelty and portability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2024 | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, , 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 25 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 17 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm Folded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 25W wired, PD, QC2, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4200 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Koala Grey, Beach Sand, Spritz Orange | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Models | - | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N |
| Price | $ 324.90 | $ 249.74 / C$ 498.99 / £ 335.00 / € 387.00 / ₹ 34,180 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:00h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Motorola Razr 2024
- Unique foldable design offers portability.
- 30W fast wired charging is competitive.
- Potentially lower price point than traditional flagships.
- Likely compromises on battery life due to form factor.
- Dimensity 7300X chipset is less powerful than the Exynos 2400e.
- Foldable display crease may be distracting.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Excellent battery life (42-hour endurance).
- Powerful Exynos 2400e processor for demanding tasks.
- Bright and vibrant display (1372 nits).
- Traditional form factor lacks the novelty of a foldable.
- 25W charging is slower than some competitors.
- May be more expensive than the Razr 2024.
Display Comparison
The Galaxy S24 FE boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1372 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Razr 2024’s display specs are not provided, foldable displays generally prioritize flexibility over peak brightness. The S24 FE’s panel likely benefits from Samsung’s established display technology, potentially including LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to power efficiency. The Razr’s foldable nature introduces a crease, a visual element users must consider, while the S24 FE offers a traditional, uninterrupted viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Razr 2024, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung’s Galaxy S24 FE benefits from its established camera expertise. While the S24 FE’s main sensor size is unknown, its image processing algorithms are renowned for producing vibrant and detailed photos. The absence of information regarding OIS on the Razr 2024 raises concerns about low-light performance and video stabilization. We can assume the S24 FE will offer a more refined and versatile camera experience, particularly in challenging conditions. The focus should be on the primary sensor performance, as the inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE’s Exynos 2400e, a 10-core processor, demonstrably outpaces the Motorola Razr 2024’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300X in raw CPU power. The Exynos’s core configuration (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) allows for more aggressive task scheduling and faster processing of complex workloads. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, suggesting comparable efficiency, but the Exynos’s higher clock speeds and additional cores provide a clear advantage in benchmarks and real-world performance. The Razr’s Dimensity 7300X is still capable, but geared towards efficient everyday tasks rather than intensive gaming or video editing. The S24 FE likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE’s battery endurance is a standout feature, offering a remarkable 42-hour endurance and an active use score of 11 hours and 48 minutes. This is significantly more than what is typically expected from a flagship device. While the Razr 2024’s battery capacity is not specified, foldable phones often compromise on battery size to accommodate the folding mechanism. The S24 FE’s 25W wired charging with PD and QC2 support, achieving 50% charge in 30 minutes, is competitive with the Razr 2024’s 30W charging. The S24 FE also adds the convenience of 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Razr.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 2024 if you prioritize a compact, pocketable design and are intrigued by the foldable form factor, accepting potential trade-offs in raw processing power and battery longevity. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE if you value consistent performance for demanding tasks, all-day battery life, and a more mature software experience, even if it means sacrificing the unique appeal of a foldable display.