Motorola Razr 2024 vs. Oppo Find N3 Flip: A Deep Dive into the Foldable World
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and faster charging, the Oppo Find N3 Flip emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9200 chipset and impressive 12:58h active use score outweigh the Razr 2024’s more affordable price point. However, the Razr 2024 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2024 | Oppo Find N3 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, , 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 25 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 17 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm Folded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 15W wireless | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Koala Grey, Beach Sand, Spritz Orange | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | - | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | $ 324.90 | About 1200 EUR |
Motorola Razr 2024
- More affordable price point
- Compact and stylish foldable design
- Efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300X chipset
- Limited battery performance data
- Slower charging speeds (30W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the Oppo
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- Exceptional battery life (12:58h active use)
- Fast 44W wired charging
- Powerful Dimensity 9200 chipset for smooth performance
- Higher price tag
- Potential for more heat generation under heavy load
- Larger size/weight compared to the Razr 2024 (speculation based on design)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a measured peak brightness of 939 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in outdoor conditions compared to the Razr 2024 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the N3 Flip’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. The absence of LTPO specification for the Razr 2024 suggests it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates as efficiently as the N3 Flip, potentially impacting battery life. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, but Oppo generally excels in display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s camera is described as offering both photo and video capabilities, suggesting a more comprehensive system. The Razr 2024’s camera details are absent, making a direct comparison difficult. Given Oppo’s history, it’s likely the N3 Flip features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes. The absence of information regarding OIS on either device makes it impossible to assess stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Motorola Razr 2024 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4nm), while the Oppo Find N3 Flip packs the more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4nm). The 9200’s Cortex-X3 prime core (3.05 GHz) offers a substantial performance leap over the Razr’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.5 GHz). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Oppo. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, offering good efficiency, but the 9200’s architectural advantages are clear. The Razr 2024’s CPU configuration (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is also less capable than the N3 Flip’s (4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510).
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N3 Flip shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 12:58h active use score and a 92h endurance rating. This is a significant advantage over the Razr 2024, which lacks comparable battery data. The N3 Flip’s 44W wired charging (50% in 23 minutes) is also considerably faster than the Razr 2024’s 30W charging. The inclusion of reverse wired charging on the N3 Flip adds further versatility, allowing it to charge other devices. The Razr 2024’s 15W wireless charging is a slower alternative.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Razr 2024 if you need a stylish, compact foldable at a more accessible price point and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prioritize exceptional battery endurance, rapid 44W charging, and a more powerful processor for multitasking and content creation.