Motorola Razr 2022 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 edges out the Razr 2022 thanks to its superior battery life, faster charging, and slightly more refined software experience. While the Razr boasts a unique external display, the Z Flip4 offers a more well-rounded package for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (6CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2022, August 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 18 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame (7000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 167.0 x 79.8 x 7.6 mm Folded: 86.5 x 79.8 x 17 mm | Unfolded: 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm Folded: 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9-17.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.5 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Second external AMOLED display, 2.7 inches, 573 x 800 pixels | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.9 inches, 260 x 512 pixels (Gorilla Glass Victus+) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, auto HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Auto HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh | Li-Po 3700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Satin Black | Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold, Blue, Yellow, White, Navy, Khaki, Red |
| Models | XT2251-1 | SM-F721B, SM-F721B/DS, SM-F721N, SM-F721U, SM-F721U1, SM-F721W, SM-F7210 |
| Price | About 670 EUR | $ 214.99 / C$ 334.00 / £ 219.00 / € 284.00 / ₹ 40,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.02 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 64h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 965260 (v9) GeekBench: 3944 (v5.1) GFXBench: 76fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 685754 (v8) | 800001 (v9) GeekBench: 3913 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Razr 2022
- Unique external display
- Stylish and compact design
- Flagship performance
- Excellent build quality
- Shorter battery life
- Slower charging
- Limited external display functionality
- Potentially higher price
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
- Longer battery life
- Faster charging (wired & wireless)
- More refined software
- More versatile cover screen
- Water resistance
- Less distinctive design compared to Razr
- Smaller cover screen than Razr
- Pricey
Display Comparison
The Razr 2022 takes a slight lead in peak brightness with 1033 nits compared to the Z Flip4's 919 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal) and vibrant colors. The Razr's external display is a key differentiator, allowing for limited app usage without unfolding, while the Z Flip4's cover screen is smaller but more functional for notifications.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable, with both offering capable photo and video capabilities. The Z Flip4 generally produces slightly more consistent results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Both phones benefit from computational photography enhancements, but the Z Flip4's software processing tends to be more refined.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and CPU configuration, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and effortless app navigation on both devices. Real-world performance differences will be minimal.
Battery Life
This is where the Z Flip4 truly shines. Its endurance rating of 92h significantly surpasses the Razr 2022's 64h. The Z Flip4 also offers faster 25W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging, providing greater flexibility and convenience.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Razr 2022 is ideal for those prioritizing a stylish design and a convenient external display for quick tasks. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is a better choice for users seeking longer battery life, faster charging, and a more mature software ecosystem.