Motorola Razr 2022 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Razr 2022 boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chip and a brighter display, offering a premium experience. However, the Z Flip3 5G provides longer battery life and faster charging, along with a more established ecosystem. Ultimately, the Razr wins on performance, while the Z Flip3 excels in practicality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Razr 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 78, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2021, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 18 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame (7000 series), hinge (stainless steel) | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 167.0 x 79.8 x 7.6 mm Folded: 86.5 x 79.8 x 17 mm | Unfolded: 166 x 72.2 x 6.9 mm Folded: 86.4 x 72.2 x 15.9-17.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.5 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Second external AMOLED display, 2.7 inches, 573 x 800 pixels | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.9 inches, 260 x 512 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, auto HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Auto HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 15W wired 10W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh | Li-Po 3300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Satin Black | Phantom Black, Green, Lavender, Cream, White, Pink, Gray, Thom Browne Edition, Bespoke Edition, Wooyoungmi Edition, Dream White |
| Models | XT2251-1 | SM-F711B, SM-F711N, SM-F711U, SM-F711U1, SM-F711W, SM-F7110 |
| Price | About 670 EUR | € 279.00 / $ 208.04 / £ 215.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 64h | Endurance rating 69h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 965260 (v9) GeekBench: 3944 (v5.1) GFXBench: 76fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 596866 (v8) | 682223 (v9) GeekBench: 3441 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Razr 2022
- Significantly faster performance
- Brighter display
- Larger and more functional external display
- Faster charging (30W)
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Camera not as consistently good as Z Flip3
- Potentially higher price
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
- Longer battery life
- Faster charging (wireless and reverse wireless)
- More established foldable ecosystem
- Generally better camera performance
- Slower processor
- Less bright display
- Smaller external display
- Slower wired charging (15W)
Display Comparison
The Razr 2022 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1033 nits, significantly outshining the Z Flip3's 935 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (nominal 'infinite'), but the Razr's superior brightness makes it more usable outdoors. The external display on the Razr is also larger and more functional, allowing for more app interactions.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Z Flip3 5G generally produces more consistent and reliable results. Samsung's image processing is well-regarded. The Razr's camera is improved over previous iterations, but still lags behind the Z Flip3 in overall quality and features. Low-light performance is a particular area where the Z Flip3 shines.
Performance
Here, the Razr 2022 leaves no doubt. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Z Flip3's Snapdragon 888 5G. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Razr's CPU also has higher clock speeds.
Battery Life
The Z Flip3 5G edges out the Razr 2022 in battery endurance, offering a slightly longer lifespan based on endurance ratings (69h vs 64h). However, the Razr 2022's 30W charging is faster than the Z Flip3's 15W wired charging, partially offsetting the battery difference.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Razr 2022 is ideal for users prioritizing performance, a stunning display, and a nostalgic design. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is a better choice for those seeking longer battery life, faster charging, and a more mature foldable experience with broader software support.