Realme X2 Pro vs Motorola One Zoom: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Realme X2 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ delivers significantly faster processing speeds and smoother gaming. However, the Motorola One Zoom remains a compelling option for those seeking a well-rounded device with good battery life and a capable camera at a potentially lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola One Zoom | Realme X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 05 | 2019, October 15. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda King), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 75 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda King glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Call records | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| UFS 2.0 | 64GB UFS 2.1, 128/256GB UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8.1 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@240fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with Dolby Atmos stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers) |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio (incl. speakers) | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | No | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 50W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 625 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Gray, Cosmic Purple, Brushed Bronze | Lunar White, Neptune Blue, Red Master Edition, Gray Master Edition |
| Models | SGP771 | RMX1931 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | 1.26 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.71 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -91.6dB / Crosstalk -91.8dB | Noise -91.3dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 90h | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 85dB | Voice 82dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 91dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 146810 (v7), 180000 (v8) GeekBench: 5802 (v4.4), 1534 (v5.1) GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 396827 (v7), 467653 (v8) GeekBench: 10373 (v4.4) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Zoom
- Excellent battery life (90h endurance)
- Versatile camera system
- Balanced feature set
- Mid-range Snapdragon 675 processor
- Slow 15W charging
Realme X2 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 855+ performance
- Ultra-fast 50W charging (35 min to 100%)
- Potentially superior image processing
- Battery life comparable to the One Zoom despite higher power chip
- May be more expensive than the One Zoom
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. However, the Motorola One Zoom boasts a measured peak brightness of 690 nits, which will provide better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the X2 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X2 Pro’s higher processing power could enable features like higher refresh rates (though not explicitly stated in the provided data), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. The lack of specific display resolution data makes a direct pixel density comparison impossible, but the X2 Pro’s flagship positioning suggests a sharper panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as having capable photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. Without sensor size or aperture data, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the X2 Pro’s more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 855+ will likely result in superior image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Motorola One Zoom’s camera system likely focuses on versatility, potentially offering a wider range of shooting modes. The absence of details regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device makes it impossible to assess their video stabilization performance.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Realme X2 Pro’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm process) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring a Kryo 485 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Motorola One Zoom’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm process), which, while capable, is a mid-range offering. The 7nm fabrication process of the 855+ also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The X2 Pro will excel in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, while the One Zoom will handle everyday tasks smoothly but may struggle with more intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of approximately 90-94 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Realme X2 Pro’s 50W wired charging capability is a game-changer, allowing it to reach 100% charge in just 35 minutes. The Motorola One Zoom’s 15W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to fully replenish the battery. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the X2 Pro, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Zoom if you need a reliable daily driver with a good camera for everyday photography and value long battery life over peak performance. You'll appreciate its balanced feature set and potentially lower price point. Buy the Realme X2 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and incredibly fast charging. The Snapdragon 855+ provides a substantial performance boost, making it ideal for power users and mobile gamers.