The Motorola One Zoom and Honor 9X Pro represent compelling options in the mid-range smartphone market, but cater to slightly different priorities. The One Zoom, with its established brand recognition, focuses on a balanced experience. The 9X Pro, leveraging Huawei’s Kirin chipset, aims for a performance advantage. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and battery efficiency, the Honor 9X Pro is the better choice. Its Kirin 810 chipset, built on a 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Motorola One Zoom’s Snapdragon 675, while also offering superior battery endurance despite similar capacity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/100 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 05 | 2019, July 23. Released 2019, August 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda King), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 75 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 163.5 x 77.3 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda King glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.27 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x1.88 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Kirin 810 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Mali-G52 MP6 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 9.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| | UFS 2.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS
16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8.1 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@240fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR | 4.2, A2DP, LE (International)5.0, A2DP, LE (China) |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | No | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 625 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Electric Gray, Cosmic Purple, Brushed Bronze | Midnight Black, Phantom Purple |
| Models | SGP771 | HLK-AL10, HLK-TL10, HLK-L41, HLK-L42 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 1.26 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.71 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -91.6dB / Crosstalk -91.8dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 90h
|
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1319:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 66dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 85dB
|
-31.1 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 146810 (v7), 180000 (v8)
GeekBench: 5802 (v4.4), 1534 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 312668 (v8)
GeekBench: 7836 (v4.4), 1911 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Zoom
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster 15W charging
- Established Motorola brand reputation
- Less powerful Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Shorter battery life compared to the 9X Pro
- Less efficient 11nm manufacturing process
Honor 9X Pro
- More powerful and efficient Kirin 810 chipset
- Longer battery life (104h endurance)
- Higher contrast ratio for a more vibrant display
- Slower 10W charging
- Less bright display in direct sunlight
- Honor/Huawei software ecosystem
Display Comparison
The Honor 9X Pro boasts a significantly higher contrast ratio of 1319:1 compared to the Motorola One Zoom’s infinite (nominal) ratio. While 'infinite' is a marketing term, the 9X Pro’s measured 517 nits brightness versus the One Zoom’s 690 nits suggests the Motorola offers a brighter panel in direct sunlight. However, the higher contrast on the Honor 9X Pro will result in deeper blacks and a more vibrant image, potentially offsetting the brightness difference for many users. Both phones lack high refresh rate panels, focusing on standard 60Hz displays.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner. However, the Honor 9X Pro’s more powerful chipset likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Motorola One Zoom’s brighter display could aid in composing shots in bright conditions. The absence of detailed camera specs necessitates a cautious approach to this comparison.
Performance
The Kirin 810 in the Honor 9X Pro, fabricated on a 7nm process, represents a clear architectural advantage over the Motorola One Zoom’s 11nm Snapdragon 675. The 9X Pro’s CPU features Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.27 GHz, offering superior single-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 675’s Kryo 460 Gold cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Kirin 810’s more efficient architecture also contributes to the 9X Pro’s longer battery life. The GPU in the Kirin 810 also provides a more capable gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Honor 9X Pro achieves a 104-hour endurance rating, surpassing the Motorola One Zoom’s 90-hour rating. This difference is largely attributable to the Kirin 810’s 7nm efficiency. Despite similar battery capacities (not specified in the data), the 9X Pro extracts more usage from each charge. The Motorola One Zoom supports 15W wired charging, while the Honor 9X Pro is limited to 10W. This means the One Zoom will charge faster, but the 9X Pro’s superior efficiency means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Zoom if you prioritize a well-rounded experience with a bright display and a familiar software experience. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the Honor 9X Pro if you value performance for gaming and demanding applications, and want longer battery life. The Kirin 810 offers a significant advantage for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Kirin 810 in the Honor 9X Pro get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 675?
While both chipsets will generate heat under load, the Kirin 810’s 7nm process generally leads to better thermal efficiency. This means the 9X Pro is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods before throttling, and may run slightly cooler overall during extended gaming, though this depends on the phone's thermal design.
❓ Given the lower charging wattage on the Honor 9X Pro, how much longer does a full charge take compared to the Motorola One Zoom?
The Motorola One Zoom’s 15W charging will result in a faster 0-100% charge time. While exact figures aren’t available, expect the One Zoom to charge approximately 30-60 minutes faster than the Honor 9X Pro’s 10W charging. However, the 9X Pro’s superior battery efficiency means you may not need to charge it as often.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications a significant drawback when comparing these two phones?
Yes, it is. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing capabilities, it’s difficult to assess the true camera performance. The Honor 9X Pro’s more powerful chipset *suggests* better image processing, but this is not guaranteed. Relying solely on 'photo/video' capabilities is insufficient for a meaningful comparison.
