The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Motorola One Vision Plus and Realme 7 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take distinctly different approaches, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 7 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Motorola One Vision Plus’s Snapdragon 665, and its blazing-fast 65W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Motorola offers a clean software experience, the Realme’s advantages outweigh this benefit.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 10. Released 2020, July 13 | 2020, September 03. Released 2020, September 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 160.9 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 65W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 34 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Blue, Crystal Pink | Mirror Blue, Mirror Silver |
| Models | - | RMX2170 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 0.52 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 3,498,000 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 278414(v8)
GeekBench: 1811 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Vision Plus
- Near-stock Android experience
- Potentially cleaner software with fewer bloatware apps
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Significantly slower processor
- Much slower charging speed (15W)
- Less capable chipset for gaming and demanding tasks
Realme 7 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 720G processor
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Software may include more pre-installed apps
- Potentially higher price compared to the Motorola
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
The Realme 7 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Motorola One Vision Plus. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays share an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Realme’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., IPS, AMOLED) and refresh rate are missing for both, but the Realme’s brightness is a quantifiable win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing are absent. Without this data, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s more powerful chipset likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes it impossible to assess stabilization performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, offers a substantial performance upgrade over the Motorola One Vision Plus’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 720G’s Kryo 465 cores, with a 2x2.3 GHz Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Silver configuration, outperform the 665’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver setup. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This means smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Realme 7 Pro.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 12 minutes and a full charge in 34 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. The Motorola One Vision Plus is limited to 15W wired charging, which will take considerably longer to fully replenish the battery. This charging speed disparity is a major advantage for the Realme 7 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Vision Plus if you prioritize a near-stock Android experience and are comfortable with slower performance and charging speeds. It’s a good fit for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Realme 7 Pro if you value performance, fast charging, and a more feature-rich software experience. This phone is ideal for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands more from their smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 7 Pro handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. While it's not a flagship-level chipset, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 665 in the Motorola One Vision Plus, thanks to its more powerful CPU and GPU.
❓ How much of a difference will the 65W charging make in real-world usage on the Realme 7 Pro?
The 65W charging is a massive convenience. Going from 0% to 50% in 12 minutes and fully charging in 34 minutes means you can quickly top up your phone during short breaks, minimizing downtime. The Motorola One Vision Plus’s 15W charging will take considerably longer, potentially requiring overnight charging for a full refill.
❓ Is the software experience on the Motorola One Vision Plus truly 'stock' Android, and what does that mean for updates?
The Motorola One Vision Plus offers a software experience very close to stock Android, with minimal bloatware and a clean user interface. However, Motorola’s update track record isn’t as consistent as some other manufacturers. While it receives updates, they may be slower to arrive compared to Realme.
